- Open Access
Effect of COVID-19 infection on psychological aspects of pre-schooler children: a cross-sectional study
Middle East Current Psychiatry volume 29, Article number: 42 (2022)
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had a tremendous effect on individual’s lives worldwide. The pandemic’s significant socioecological impact is one of the many burdens children confront in the current crises. As a result, this study was designed to determine the psychological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on preschoolers, particularly the consequences of COVID-19 infection. This study involved 138 children aged 2–5.11 years old who were classified into two groups based on their COVID-19 infection history, which was documented via a PCR test. All participants were assessed by the Socioeconomic Scale and The Children’s Behavior Checklist (CBCL).
COVID-19 infection was found in 21.7% of the children who participated in this study. Furthermore, children with COVID-19 had a higher percentage of clinical rating on the CBCL Profile of DSM-5 scales for affective problems (13.3 vs. 7.4%), anxiety problems (13.3 vs. 9.3%), pervasive developmental problems (20 vs. 13%), and oppositional defiant problems (6.7 vs. 5.6%) than children without COVID-19. Anxiety and somatic problems had a positive correlation with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lives of children.
Children infected with COVID-19 were more likely to have psychological issues, such as affective disorders, anxiety problems, pervasive developmental problems, and oppositional defiant problems. These psychological issues had a relationship with the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lives of children.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had a tremendous effect on individual’s lives worldwide. Isolation, communication limitations, and economic collapse all significantly affected countries’ psychosocial environments. The circumstance has a significant effect on kids, teenagers, and families. Schools and kindergartens have been shut down, social connections are strictly restricted, and recreational activities outside the home have been canceled. Parents are expected to work from home while still supporting their children’s homeschooling. In the absence of other family members or social support systems, external assistance is no longer available. While COVID-19 has been a major issue and long-term impact on health and mental health , the economy has been in decline, with increasing unemployment rates in all affected countries. Children, teenagers, and families are under a lot of stress, which could lead to mental health issues and violence 
The pandemic’s significant socioecological impact is one of the many burdens children confront in the current crises. Children’s environments are influenced by various perspectives, including those of their families and communities and their viewpoints themselves .
Since the pandemic was revealed, essential services, such as nursing, schools, and basic medical support, have been disrupted or restricted at the neighborhood level . Notably, child services and current programs of assistance or monitoring protection have been affected and suspended . The lack of these essential services can be terrible for children and families in trouble. Furthermore, leisure activities have been restricted: in most countries, public playgrounds are closed and social group activities are prohibited .
Inadequate attention to the mental health of children and teenagers can lead to long-term mental problems, which can affect a person’s ability to lead a healthy and productive life . As a result, mental health problems in children and adolescents frequently have long-term severe negative consequences [7,8,9].
Early diagnosis and treatment of these problems are in everyone’s best interest, especially for kids, teens, families, and societies [10,11,12]. Community burden, measurement, and the survey’s planning and execution were all significant ways in which epidemiology might help better understand children’s and adolescents’ mental health .
As a result, this study was designed to determine the psychological impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on preschoolers, particularly the consequences of COVID-19 infection.
Participants and procedures
A cross-sectional study was conducted from February 2021 to May 2021. In this study, 138 children aged 2–5.11 years were selected from three Assiut government kindergarten’s facilities. Children were selected from three Assiut government kindergartens’ facilities to ensure diversity of sociodemographic background as 3 kindergartens were from 3 different areas of the city (from the east, west, and centers of the city). Students were permitted to go to school 2 days per week at this time. The sample size was calculated using the statcalc program of EPI-info version 7.2 using population survey or descriptive observational study calculation, according to the proportion of COVID-19 infection among preschool children of 3.8% . The acceptable margin of error was 5%, confidence level 95%, and design effect 1%. The minimum required sample size should be 57 patients. The recruited children were allowed to attend their kindergarten after their COVID-19 infection for at least 2 weeks. We obtained approval from the managers of the kindergartens’ facilities to post an invitation using Google form on the website of the kindergarten’s facilities requesting parents to join in the evaluation of their kids for our research. At Assiut University’s Child Psychiatry Clinic, we conducted interviews with the parents and children who accepted our participation request. Furthermore, the participants were split into two groups: those with a history of COVID-19 infection (N = 30) as evidenced by a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) report and those without a history of COVID-19 infection (N = 108). Participants with mental disorders, neurological or medical problems, or an intelligence quotient of less than 70 were excluded from the study.
A semi-structured interview was conducted by the researchers, which provided data on the participants’ full mental and medical history at the start of the study. Parents were asked about their children’s past COVID-19 infection, which was confirmed by a PCR report, and the length of time since the diagnosis.
Age, gender, birth order, number of children, delivery type and problems, speech and motor development delays, and family history of psychiatric disorders were among the sociodemographic data obtained.
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lives of children
This was gathered by some questions, such as “Is there a member of the family (first-degree relative) who has COVID-19 infection?,” “Is there anyone in the family (first-degree relative) who has died of COVID-19 infection?,” “Were there school issues (academic) as a result of COVID-19 infection?,” “Did COVID-19 infection cause social issues (peers)?,” “Did COVID-19 infection cause problems in parent–child relationships?,” “Did the household expenses increase as a result of COVID-19 infection?,” and Has COVID-19 infection resulted in a decrease in household income?.”
The Socioeconomic Scale  is a tool used to determine socioeconomic burdens and social classes. It also considers four essential factors: the educational levels of the father and mother, their individual employment, the family’s overall income, and the family’s standard of living.
The Children’s Behavior Checklist (CBCL)  is a 100-item parent-reported questionnaire meant to track preschoolers’ troublesome behaviors. The responses are rated based on the child’s behavior in the past 6 months.
A statistical package for the social sciences was used for all statistical analyses (version 26). Frequencies and percentages were used to express descriptive data. To investigate categorical variables, the chi-square test was performed. To analyze quantitative variables and determine differences in mean values between the two groups, the independent t test was performed. To investigate the relationship between several variables, the spearman correlation was applied. A point-biserial correlation coefficient was used to have a correlation for a dichotomous categorical variable and a continuous variable. The statistical significance was determined by P-values of less than 0.05.
Data on socioeconomics
There was no significant difference between the groups under study regarding sociodemographic data. This study comprised 138 preschool-aged children. COVID-19 infection was found in 21.7% of the children who participated in this study. More than half of the participants were females (56.5%); however, more than half of the participants who had COVID-19 were males (60%). Regarding birth order, most participants were born first. Moreover, most participants who underwent Cesarean section had no postpartum complications, had normal speech and motor development, no family history of psychiatric illnesses, and a socioeconomic standing in the middle (see Table 1).
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lives of children
A child with COVID-19 infection was significantly more impacted in their life by the pandemic in terms of family members infected or dying from it, and the effects it had on their educational, social, and parental issues increased expenses and decreased income. The mean of the duration of disease was 1.4 months (see Table 2).
According to CBCL scores, the percentage of children with clinical ratings of syndrome profiles during the COVID-19 pandemic was 18.8% for withdrawal, 7.2% for somatic complaints, 14.5% for anxious/depressed, 5.8% for sleep problems, 4.3% for emotionally reactive behavior, 5.8% for aggressive behavior, 8.7% for affective problems, 10.1% for anxiety problems, 15.9% for pervasive developmental problems, and 5.8% for aggressive behavior.
In terms of somatic complaints, sleep problems, attention problems, oppositional defiant behavior, externalizing problems, and total problems, significant statistical differences were observed between the groups under study. A higher percentage of clinical rating was found in children who had COVID-19 than in children who did not have COVID-19 in the zones of withdrawal (26.7 vs. 16.7%, respectively), somatic complaints (26.7 vs. 1.9%, respectively), anxiety/depression (20 vs. 13%, respectively), sleep problems (13.3 vs. 3.7%, respectively), emotional reactivity (6.7 vs. 3.7%, respectively), and aggression (6.7 vs. 5.6%).
Furthermore, children with COVID-19 had a higher percentage of clinical rating on the CBCL Profile of DSM-5 scales for affective problems (13.3 vs. 7.4%), anxiety problems (13.3 vs. 9.3%), pervasive developmental problems (20 vs. 13%), and oppositional defiant problems (6.7 vs. 5.6%) than children without COVID-19 (see Tables 3 and 4).
In Table 5 shows the correlation for CBCL subscales and sociodemographic data and impact of COVID-19 on children. Regarding CBCL profile of syndromes, somatic problems had positive correlation school problems due to COVID-19 (r= 0.7, P-value= 0.003), social problems due to COVID-19 (r= 0.66, P-value= 0.007), and decrease family income due to COVID-19 (r= 0.6, P-value= 0.006). Sleep problems had a negative correlation with number of children (r= −0.5, P-value= 0.004).
Regarding CBCL profile of DSM-5 scales, anxiety problems had a positive correlation with school problems due to COVID-19 (r= 0.5, P-value= 0.035), social problems due to COVID-19 (r= 0.6, P-value= 0.01), increase family expenses due to COVID-19 (r= 0.5, P-value= 0.034), and decrease family income due to COVID-19 (r= 0.6, P-value= 0.007).
Having died family member from COVID-19 infection had positive correlation with attention problems (r= 0.7, P-value= 0.0001) and pervasive developmental problems (r= 0.8, P-value= 0.0001). Total score of socioeconomic scale had negative correlation with affective problems (r= −0.52, P-value= 0.045).
To our knowledge, this is the first study that has assessed the psychological effects of COVID-19 infection on preschoolers. COVID-19 infection was found in 21.7% of the children in this study. Children who had COVID-19 infection were more affected by the COVID-19 pandemic than those who did not have COVID-19 infection in terms of family members who got COVID-19 or died of COVID-19; school, social, and parent problems; more expenses; and less income, according to this study.
COVID-19-positive children had a higher rate of clinical ratings for affective disorders, anxiety difficulties, pervasive developmental problems, and oppositional defiant problems than COVID-19-negative children in this study.
In the current study, somatic problems had a positive correlation with school problems, social problems, and decrease family income due to COVID-19. Sleep problems had a negative correlation with a number of children. Regarding the CBCL profile of DSM-5 scales, anxiety problems a had positive correlation with school problems, social problems, increase family expenses, and decrease family income due to COVID-19. Having a dead family member from COVID-19 infection had a positive correlation with attention problems and pervasive developmental problems. The total score of the socioeconomic scale had a negative correlation with affective problems.
The first study has examined quarantined children and adolescents and discovered that they were suffering from depression, anxiety, or both. In contrast, the second study was conducted during the pandemic and discovered symptoms of inattention, clinging, worry, and anger [17, 18]. Another study in India has examined quarantined children and adolescents and found a high rate of psychological distress associated with feelings of helplessness, worry, and fear .
Another study has evaluated the effects of COVID-19 infection on children aged 6–12 years. It was found that children infected with COVID-19 were more likely to experience withdrawal, anxiety/depression, somatic difficulties, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, and total problems .
A significant restriction in social relations to close family members was observed. Contact with peers has been forbidden or severely restricted in various countries . The significance of peer contact in the well-being of kids and adolescents is of great importance as restrictions in peer contact could have a negative impact [22, 23].
In terms of education, numerous countries have experienced school lockdown . As a result, significant negative consequences, such as wasted educational time, limited peer connection, and a lack of daily regularity, must be addressed. Furthermore, in some societies, stigmatization of diseased individuals is common.
The pandemic has caused a reorganization of daily life at the household level. All family members must deal with the strain of social exclusion. Academic disruptions have resulted in homeschooling and the possible postponing of tests. Parents have faced growing pressure to maintain work and enterprises at home and educate school-aged children at home. Caregivers’ assets, such as relatives, have been curtailed, causing disrupted family relationships. The worry of losing a member of a high-risk group’s family can escalate. The pandemic alters families’ regular grief rituals in the event of death. Grief for lost family members, particularly when engagement with an infected individual is limited or denied, can result in adjustment problems, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and even suicide in people of all ages . Moreover, parents must explain and describe the COVID-19 outbreak to their children and cope with the concern and stress that come with such uncertain times. COVID-19 may create anxiety in all family members. When all of this occurs simultaneously, it can produce a great deal of stress and psychological distress for the entire family.
The pandemic has significant economic consequences and places financial strain on many households. Economic pressure, especially with social exclusion, has been shown to be associated with a major issue in mental health. Economic recessions, as well as associated issues, such as unemployment, financial difficulty, and unmanageable debts, have been connected to impaired mental health [26, 27]. Parental mental illness and substance addiction have a major impact on parent–child relationships and raise the probability of mental health disorders in children [28, 29].
During the COVID-19 pandemic, a large surge in domestic violence was observed . Financial issues and loss of income can lead to feelings of financial strain and subsequently marital discord . The quarantine can lead to a loss of liberty and privacy and an increase in stress levels. There is the potential for abusers to become more controlling as they take back control. Victims’ chances of escaping abusive partners are reduced, while their exposure to offenders is raised . During the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase in domestic violence was observed worldwide . António Guterres, the UN Secretary General, called attention to a “horrifying global spike in domestic abuse” . Domestic violence has a major impact on children’s mental health  and could have long-term implications .
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the lives of children and adolescents has been documented in the literature. The COVID-19 pandemic distress disrupted the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, which can interfere with various physiological processes during the early stages of development, by increasing the generation and release of inflammatory mediators. This unbalance could result in immune, endocrine, and neurological system dysfunctions and a higher chance of psychiatric diseases later in life .
This study provided a few key policy implications for policymakers, which could be used to increase support to families with COVID-19 infection, because infected children suffer more and are more likely to develop mental health problems. As a result, mental screening for youngsters has become more necessary. Psychoeducational programs are needed to make people at school, at home, and in the community aware of these kids.
This study had some problems, for example, its small sample size. So, future studies with large, representative samples will be needed to ensure that our findings are valid. Moreover, we could not examine the association between the severity of COVID-19 infection according to the World Health Organization guidelines  and psychological difficulties because most children received care at home. Finally, when compared to adults, children have a greater capability for brain plasticity, particularly in their ability to recover from brain damage or major surgery such as hemispherectomy for epilepsy. Basic mechanisms that promote plasticity during development include neurogenesis persistence in some areas of the brain, neuronal elimination by apoptosis or programmed cell death, postnatal proliferation and synaptic pruning, and activity-dependent refinement of neural connections (Johnston, 2004). So, the long-time consequence of COVID-19 is considered crucial to evaluate brain changes. Also, determining causal relationships between factors was also difficult because of the study’s cross-sectional design. As a result, a longitudinal study should be conducted.
COVID-19 was found in 21.7% of the children who participated in this study. Children infected with COVID-19 were more likely to have psychological issues, such as affective disorders, anxiety problems, pervasive developmental problems, and oppositional defiant problems.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are available from corresponded on request.
Coronavirus disease 2019
The Checklist for Children’s Behaviour
Ahmed GK, Khedr EM, Hamad DA, Meshref TS, Hashem MM, Aly MM (2021) Long term impact of Covid-19 infection on sleep and mental health: a cross-sectional study. Psychiatry Res 305:114243
Fegert JM, Vitiello B, Plener PL, Clemens V (2020) Challenges and burden of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic for child and adolescent mental health: a narrative review to highlight clinical and research needs in the acute phase and the long return to normality. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 14:20
Technical note: protection of children during the coronavirus pandemic. The Alliance for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action. https://alliancecpha.org/en/COVD19. Accessed 01 June 2022
Flaxman S, Mishra S, Gandy A, Unwin HJT, Coupland H, Mellan TA, et al (2020) Estimating the number of infections and the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in European countries: technical description update. arXiv: Applications
Fegert J, Berthold O, Clemens V, Kölch M (2020) COVID-19-pandemie: Kinderschutz ist systemrelevant. Dtsch Arztebl Int 117(14):A-703
World Health O (2003) Caring for children and adolescents with mental disorders: setting WHO directions. World Health Organization, Geneva
Rutter M, Kim-Cohen J, Maughan B (2006) Continuities and discontinuities in psychopathology between childhood and adult life. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip 47(3-4):276–295
Kessler RC, Avenevoli S, Costello EJ, Georgiades K, Green JG, Gruber MJ, He JP, Koretz D, McLaughlin KA, Petukhova M et al (2012) Prevalence, persistence, and sociodemographic correlates of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement. Arch Gen Psychiatry 69(4):372–380
Hafekost J, Lawrence D, Boterhoven de Haan K, Johnson SE, Saw S, Buckingham WJ, Sawyer MG, Ainley J, Zubrick SR (2016) Methodology of young minds matter: the second Australian child and adolescent survey of mental health and wellbeing. Austr New Zealand J Psych 50(9):866–875
Alyahri A, Goodman R (2008) The prevalence of DSM-IV psychiatric disorders among 7-10 year old Yemeni schoolchildren. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 43(3):224–230
Belfer ML (2008) Child and adolescent mental disorders: the magnitude of the problem across the globe. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip 49(3):226–236
Ford T (2008) Practitioner review: how can epidemiology help us plan and deliver effective child and adolescent mental health services? J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip 49(9):900–914
Costello J (2009) Editorial: how epidemiology helps. J Child Psychol Psychiatry Allied Discip 50(4):361–362
Bhuiyan MU, Stiboy E, Hassan MZ, Chan M, Islam MS, Haider N, Jaffe A, Homaira N (2021) Epidemiology of COVID-19 infection in young children under five years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Vaccine 39(4):667–677
Abdel-Tawab MA (2010) 2010. Socioeconomic scale for family, revised edition. M.D. thesis in educational basics, Faculty of Education. Assiut University 3:32–55
Achenbach TM (2001) Manual for ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. University of Vermont, Research Centre for Children, Youth & Families
Chen F, Zheng D, Liu J, Gong Y, Guan Z, Lou D (2020) Depression and anxiety among adolescents during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study. Brain Behav Immun 88:36–38
Jiao WY, Wang LN, Liu J, Fang SF, Jiao FY, Pettoello-Mantovani M, Somekh E (2020) Behavioral and emotional disorders in children during the COVID-19 epidemic. J Pediatr 221:264–266.e261
Saurabh K, Ranjan S (2020) Compliance and psychological impact of quarantine in children and adolescents due to COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Pediatr 87(7):532–536
Ahmed GK, Elbeh K, Gomaa HM, Soliman S (2021) Does COVID-19 infection have an impact on children’s psychological problems? Middle East Curr Psych 28(1):77
The British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)(2020) Coronavirus: what lockdown is like for kids all around the world. https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/52106625. Accessed 25 Jan 2022
Gifford-Smith ME, Brownell CA (2003) Childhood peer relationships: social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. J Sch Psychol 41(4):235–284
Oberle E, Schonert-Reichl KA, Thomson KC (2010) Understanding the link between social and emotional well-being and peer relations in early adolescence: gender-specific predictors of peer acceptance. J Youth Adoles 39(11):1330–1342
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2020) COVID-19 educational disruption and response. https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse. Accessed 01 Feb 2022
Stikkelbroek Y, Bodden DH, Reitz E, Vollebergh WA, van Baar AL (2016) Mental health of adolescents before and after the death of a parent or sibling. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 25(1):49–59
Frasquilho D, Matos MG, Salonna F, Guerreiro D, Storti CC, Gaspar T, Caldas-de-Almeida JM (2016) Mental health outcomes in times of economic recession: a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health 16:115
Haw C, Hawton K, Gunnell D, Platt S (2015) Economic recession and suicidal behaviour: possible mechanisms and ameliorating factors. Int J Soc Psychiatry 61(1):73–81
Riley AW, Valdez CR, Barrueco S, Mills C, Beardslee W, Sandler I, Rawal P (2008) Development of a family-based program to reduce risk and promote resilience among families affected by maternal depression: theoretical basis and program description. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 11(1-2):12–29
Rasic D, Hajek T, Alda M, Uher R (2014) Risk of mental illness in offspring of parents with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of family high-risk studies. Schizophr Bull 40(1):28–38
Schneider D, Harknett K, McLanahan S (2016) Intimate partner violence in the great recession. Demography 53(2):471–505
Elder G Jr, Conger RD (2000) Children of the land: adversity and success in rural America. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Peterman A, Potts A, O'Donnell M, Thompson K, Shah N, Oertelt-Prigione S, Van Gelder N (2020) Pandemics and violence against women and children, vol. 528. Center for Global Development, Washington, DC
Graham-Harrison E, Giuggrida A, Smith H, Ford L (2020) Lockdowns around the World Bring Rise in Domestic Violence. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/mar/28/lockdowns-world-rise-domestic-violence. Accessed 26 Dec 2021
United Nation (UN) chief calls for domestic violence ‘ceasefre’ amid ‘horrifying global surge. https://news.un.org/en/story/2020/04/1061052. Accessed 17 Dec 2021
MacMillan HL, Wathen CN, Varcoe CM (2013) Intimate partner violence in the family: considerations for children's safety. Child Abuse Negl 37(12):1186–1191
Hillis SD, Mercy JA, Saul JR (2017) The enduring impact of violence against children. Psychol Health Med 22(4):393–405
de Figueiredo CS, Sandre PC, Portugal LCL, Mázala-de-Oliveira T, da Silva CL, Raony Í, Ferreira ES, Giestal-de-Araujo E, Dos Santos AA, Bomfim PO (2021) COVID-19 pandemic impact on children and adolescents' mental health: biological, environmental, and social factors. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 106:110171
World Health Organization (2020) Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) when COVID-19 disease is suspected: interim guidance, 13 march 2020. World Health Organization
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was ethically approved by the institutional review board of Assiut University’s Faculty of Medicine (IRB). A clinical trial number (NCT04762394) was assigned to this study on February 21, 2021, and can be found at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04762394. Parents completed informed permission forms on behalf of their children in order to take part in the research. These individuals were reassured of the confidentiality of their data, which was then released to the public in an anonymous manner. To the standards of the institution and/or national research committee, this study was conducted according to the Helsinki Declaration and its subsequent amendments.
Consent for publication
The participant has consented to publishing their data result.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmed, G.K., Mostafa, S., Elbeh, K. et al. Effect of COVID-19 infection on psychological aspects of pre-schooler children: a cross-sectional study. Middle East Curr Psychiatry 29, 42 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-022-00207-y
- Psychiatric comorbidity