Skip to main content
Middle East Current Psychiatry
Download PDF

C-reactive protein as a biomarker for unipolar versus bipolar depression: a cross-sectional study

Middle East Current Psychiatry volume 30, Article number: 69 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Differentiating unipolar depression from bipolar depression is clinically important. The identification of biomarkers that characterize the pathophysiology of each disorder may provide biological targets for treatment. The objective of the study was to demonstrate a relationship between CRP level and the severity of depressive symptoms and see if C-reactive protein (CRP) levels can be used as a biomarker to distinguish between unipolar and bipolar depression. A convenience sample of 90 individuals was consecutively recruited from the psychiatry outpatient clinic at Beni-Suef University Hospital, Egypt. They were divided into three equal groups: patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) (group 1), bipolar depression (group 2), and a healthy volunteer group (group 3). Patient groups were assessed using semi-structured interviews, and CRP levels were measured.

Results

Patients with bipolar depression and MDD showed a significantly higher score on the Beck Depression Inventory scale than the control group (32.97 ± 2.4 vs. 31.93 ± 2.3 vs. 8.00 ± 2.3 in all groups respectively) (P-value < 0.001). Patients with bipolar depression and MDD showed a significantly higher serum CRP level than the control group (134.96 ± 16.45 vs. 133.86 ± 17.59 vs.56.04 ± 26.71 vs. in all groups respectively) (P-value < 0.001). In all studied groups, elevated plasma CRP levels have a significant linear correlation with the severity of depression as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) (r = 0.887, P-value < 0.001).

Conclusions

Serum CRP levels are significantly higher in MDD and BD patients when compared to controls. Individuals with higher CRP levels had more severe depression, and this finding was significantly higher in women than in men.

Background

Recent studies suggest that chronic inflammation may play a role in mental disorders. Circulating pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine profiles are abnormal in patients with schizophrenia, MDD, and bipolar disorder [1]. Some meta-analyses have revealed an increase in the levels of inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), homocysteine, tumour necrosis factor (TNF), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), in patients with depression. Specific genes may also cause both increased depression and inflammation, as some inflammation-related genes have been linked to major depression and bipolar disorder [2].

Tillett and Francis discovered C-reactive protein (CRP) in 1930. It is a pentraxin superfamily member. The discovery of a distinct third fraction in the sera of patients with pneumococcus infection that could precipitate the “C” polysaccharide derived from the pneumococcus cell wall was the first feature of this protein [3].

The liver primarily produces C-reactive protein because of a pentamer composed of five identical, non-covalently linked, 23-kD protomers that are folded into two antiparallel sheets using the “jelly roll” topology. For apoptotic cell membranes and bacterial cell walls, each protomer has a binding face with a PC-binding site [4].

The liver is what produces the vast majority of CRP. Although CRP production has been reported in a variety of other cell types, such as adipocytes, renal cells, neuronal cells, respiratory epithelial cells, and leukocytes, it is not believed that extrahepatic CRP production has a significant influence on plasma CRP concentrations [5, 6].

C-reactive protein levels in the blood rise during inflammatory conditions like rheumatoid arthritis, certain cardiovascular diseases, and infection. Within 24–72 h of severe tissue damage, such as trauma or progressive cancer, CRP plasma levels rise from around 1 µg/mL to over 500 µg. Age, gender, smoking status, weight, lipid levels, and blood pressure are all factors that can affect baseline CRP levels [7]. Thus, in obese patients, a calorie-restricted diet may reduce chronic inflammation and C-reactive protein (CRP) [8]. Active smokers with a C-allele at rs3093068 of 12 CRP single-nucleotide polymorphisms are more likely to have elevated CRP concentrations; smoking as a behaviour contributes to increased inflammation levels [9, 10].

Several studies have found that inflammatory markers can help distinguish between mood disorders and illness stages, as well as predict treatment response [10, 11].

The objective of the study

The study demonstrated a relationship between the level of CRP and the severity of depressive symptoms among those with MDD and bipolar disorder (depressive type).

Methods

Study design

This comparative cross-sectional study had the objective of exploring the relationship between CRP level and severity of depressive symptoms and whether the risk of the CRP level may be used as a biomarker to distinguish between unipolar and bipolar depression.

The inclusion criteria for the participants in this study included age 18–45 years old and having no history of other medical condition that make them in no need of taking medications or vitamins, and persons in that age group do not take vitamins or supplements on a regular basis.

The exclusion criteria of the participants in this study included a young age of less than18 years or more than 45 years, suffering of any chronic diseases that can affect CRP and suffering from any psychiatric diseases or disorders, pregnancy, or lactation. Participants with illicit drugs, substance use disorders, or other psychiatric disorders have been excluded from the study.

Samples

A convenience sample of 90 individuals was recruited based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The sample was divided into three equal groups, involving MDD: patients (group 1), bipolar depression patients (group 2) recruited from the psychiatry outpatient clinic at Beni-Suef University Hospital, Egypt, and a healthy volunteer group (group 3) recruited from the nursing and administrative staff at Beni-Suef University Hospital. They were matched with the patient groups in terms of age, sex, and socio-demographic status. Epi Info, version 3.5.1, 2008, was used to calculate the sample size. The patients who participated in the study were divided based on a confidence level of 95%, a power of 80%, and a 50% prevalence: 30 patients with MDD, 30 patients with BD, and 30 control subjects (sample size calculations: n = [DEFF*Np(1-p)]/[(d2/Z21-α/2*(N-1) + p*(1-p)]).

Data collection procedure

Individuals of both sexes, aged 18–45 years, were invited to participate in this study from February 2019 to August 2019. A total of 47 patients with MDD (previously diagnosed), 45 patients with bipolar depression (previously diagnosed), and 40 healthy volunteers were invited to participate in the study. However, 17 patients with MDD, 15 patients with bipolar depression, and 10 healthy volunteers were excluded if they had a chronic medical illness, comorbid substance use disorders or other psychiatric disorders, severe agitation, acute inflammation, were pregnant or lactating, or refused to participate.

Patients who were recruited from the psychiatry outpatient clinic at Beni-Suef University were diagnosed using a semi-structured interview derived from the DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders-5th Edition — text revised criteria in the DSM-5 for the diagnosis of major depressive disorder and bipolar depression). The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was used to assess the severity of depression in the patient group. The assessment procedure lasted for an average of 60–90 min and included obtaining venous blood samples (5 ml) that were withdrawn.

Tools

I. Brief Semi-Structured Clinical Sheet, Psychiatry Clinic, Beni-Suef University Hospital

Clinical data were obtained (including socio-demographics, onset of illness, previous episodes, family history, medical history, previous treatments, adherence to medications).

II. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I), Arabic version

To apply the diagnostic criteria for MDD and bipolar disorder (depressive type) and to rule out other psychiatric disorders, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I) was used. The SCID-I is classified into separate modules according to the categories of diagnoses. Most of sections begin with an entry question that allows the interviewer to skip the related questions if they were not met. For all diagnoses, symptoms are coded as present, subthreshold, or absent [12].

III. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Arabic version

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a self-report scale used to track depressive symptoms such as sadness, guilt, loss of interest, social withdrawal, increase and decrease in appetite or sleep, suicidal ideation, and other behavioural manifestations of depression over time to monitor symptoms and assess response to therapeutic interventions among patients with depressive illnesses. It has an acceptable level of validity because it assesses a wide range of symptoms and attitudes related to depression. The inventory consists of 21 statements on a 4-point scale, with the subject choosing the one that best describes his or her current situation. Each statement refers to a distinct behavioural manifestation. Responses are graded on a 0–3 scale, with 0 indicating no disturbance, mild, moderate, or severe disturbance. The scale runs from 0 to 63, with a higher score indicating greater depression severity [13].

Statistical analysis

Data were coded and entered using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS v. 25). The data were summarized using the minimum, maximum, mean, and standard deviation for quantitative data and the frequency distribution for qualitative data for a descriptive analysis of the results. To compare the means of two groups of quantitative variables, the Student’s t-test was used. The chi-square test was used to compare the frequency of events or two groups of categorical data. For the correlation coefficient (r), which describes the degree of relationship between two variables, the Pearson correlation test was used. The significant predictors were identified using ROC, AUC [14], and regression analysis. P 0.05 was deemed significant.

Result

Ninety participants were equally divided into three groups for the current study: 30 MDD patients, 30 bipolar depression patients, and 30 healthy controls. Regarding socio-demographic data and clinical characteristics of the studied groups, their ages ranged from 18 to 43 years, with a mean of 30.04 ± 5.7. A total of 54.4% were males. Among the participants, 63.3% were rural residents. Concerning occupation, 42.2% of the participants worked as manual workers, and 37.8% were unemployed. Approximately one-fifth of them read and write about their educational level and had a primary education. Of them, 51.1% were married. Half of the participants were non-smokers, while 36.7% smoked more than 10 cigarettes per day. A positive family history of psychiatric diseases was significantly more prevalent among the study groups (P = 0.02), as was a statistically significant duration of current episodes (P = 0.03). The BMI means 24.77 ± 3.4 between the studied groups in Table 1.

Table 1 Socio-demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied groups
Full size table

The difference between the bipolar and MDD groups was not statistically significant. Comparing mean values pairwise revealed a statistically significant difference between the control and bipolar groups (56.04, 26.71 vs. 134.96, 16.45 in both groups respectively), (P-value 0.001), a statistically significant difference between the control and MDD groups (56.04, 26.71 vs. 133.86, 17.59 in both groups respectively), (P-value 0.001), but a non-statistically significant difference was detected between the bipolar and MDD (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparative analysis of studied groups of patients with BD and MDD
Full size table

In the BD group, there was a significant positive linear correlation between CRP and depression severity (r = 0.834, P-value < 0.001), and there was a significant positive linear correlation between CRP and depression severity in the MDD group (r = 0.642 P-value < 0.001) (Table 3).

Table 3 Correlation between C-reactive protein (CRP) and depression severity as assessed by Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
Full size table

In Table 4, higher CRP levels were significantly associated with the severity of depressive symptoms, according to the linear regression analysis.

Table 4 Linear regression analysis identified an association between an increase in CRP levels and a higher risk of depression
Full size table

The ROC curve analysis results demonstrated the CRP’s diagnostic ability; the CRP had the best sensitivity/specificity balance (93.3% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity at the cut-off point of 106.50), P-value 0.001, indicating a statistically significant level of CRP serum diagnosis of MDD disease state with a 93.3% sensitivity (true-positive cases) and 96.7% specificity (true-negative cases). This suggests that CRP could be a biological marker for MDD diagnosis (Table 5).

Table 5 ROC curve analysis of sensitivity and specificity of C-reactive protein (CRP) serum level in diagnosis of MDD
Full size table

An analysis of the ROC curve was utilized to assess the diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein (CRP) serum levels in distinguishing MDD and BD disease from the normal population. The best sensitivity/specificity balance was observed for the CRP (93.3% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity at cut-off point ≥ 106.50), P-value < 0.001; therefore, the CRP serum level diagnosed the MDD disease state at a statistically significant level with a 93.3% sensitivity (true positive cases) and 96.7% specificity (true negative cases), while the best sensitivity/specificity balance was observed for the CRP (93.3% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity at cut-off point ≥ 106.50), P-value < 0.001, so the CRP serum level diagnosed the BD disease state at a statistically significant level with a 93.3% sensitivity (true-positive cases) and 96.7% specificity (true-negative cases) (Figs. 1 and 2).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The results of ROC curve analysis of sensitivity and specificity of C-reactive protein (CRP) serum level in diagnosis of MDD

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

The results of ROC curve analysis of sensitivity and specificity of C-reactive protein (CRP) serum level in diagnosis of BD

Full size image

There is no diagnostic value between MDD and BD disorders, as shown by Table 6 and Fig. 3, which also showed that there was no statistical significance (P = 0.790) with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.480 (95% confidence interval: 0.331–0.629). We conducted a ROC analysis in the two groups to determine whether CRP levels could serve as a distinct biomarker for MDD and BD disorders during a major depressive episode. The results revealed that CRP levels were not statistically significant (P-value = 0.790), with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.480 (95% confidence interval: 0.331–0.629).

Table 6 The results of ROC curve analysis of sensitivity and specificity of C-reactive protein (CRP) serum level to differentiate between both diagnoses
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

ROC curve analysis of sensitivity and specificity of C-reactive protein (CRP) serum level in diagnosis of MDD and BD

Full size image

Discussion

Socio-demographic data

The demographic data of the sample showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the studied groups as regards age, sex, residence, education, occupation, and marital status. The mean age ± SD was 29.87 ± 5.4, 29.67 ± 6.8, and 30.60 ± 4.8 for the BD, MDD, and control groups. This is consistent with studies showing that the age range of patients with BD was 20–24 years [15], and for patients with MDD, it was 18–29 years [16]. As regards the gender of the studied population, the BD group showed that 53.3% were men and 46.7% were women, and it is established that BD affects men and women equally [17]. On the other hand, 60% of the MDD group were men and 40% were women, and this was contradictory to various previous findings where depression was found to be more common in females [18]. Concerning residence, occupation, education, and marital status, there were no statistically significant differences among the three groups (P = 0.37, 0.31, 0.49, and 0.21, respectively). First-degree relatives of people with bipolar disorder are seven times more likely to develop the disorder than the general population, and the offspring of a bipolar parent has a 50% chance of developing another major psychiatric disorder [15].

Duration of current episode

The duration of the current episode was significantly longer (P = 0.030) among the studied patients with MDD as compared with patients with BD. Studies suggest that episodes of bipolar depression have a shorter duration than those of unipolar depression, but it is difficult to distinguish between BD and UD [19, 20].

Adherence to treatment

In this study, more than half of the population was not adherent to treatment (56.7% of patients with MDD and bipolar disorder). This was consistent with the results of many studies that reported a higher non-adherence percent to antidepressant therapy. The reasons for non-adherence to antidepressants were forgetting to take drugs, side effects of antidepressants, a stigma among individuals with mental illness, and the higher cost of the medication [21, 22]. It was recently discovered that one-quarter of depressed patients has excessive immune system activation [23]. Thus, depressed patients could be classified as inflammatory or non-inflammatory [19]. Treatment-resistant depression, which is far more likely to have raised inflammatory markers than treatment-responsive depression, already exists as a subcategory of depression. Chronic, low-level inflammation appears to cause depression through a variety of mechanisms. These include the kynurenine pathway and microglial cell activation, which result in a decrease in hippocampal volume. Elevated inflammatory cytokines also disrupt monoaminergic signalling, which may explain the prevalence of treatment resistance in inflammatory depression patients. As a result, if treatment-resistant depression and inflammatory depression are semi-synonymous, anti-inflammatory drugs will display high efficiency in both subtypes [23,24,25].

High C-reactive protein (CRP) level in both BD and MDD groups

Serum C-reactive protein level was significantly higher in both the BD and MDD groups as compared with controls (P = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in serum CRP levels between unipolar and bipolar depression (P = 0.838). Huang et al. discovered that depressive patients had higher serum CRP levels than non-depressive patients, and other research has discovered that the relationship between depression and inflammation is influenced by severity, type of depression, and somatic symptoms [26, 27]. Low-grade, increased CRP levels may indicate depression, independent of geographic area, age, or medications. After controlling for socio-demographic, lifestyle, and disease covariates, studies found no association between depression and elevated serum CRP, and two studies found a negative association. However, other studies reported no significant differences between controls and patients with BD [23, 28].

Correlation between C-reactive protein (CRP) and depression severity as assessed by Beck Depression Inventory

In the total population studied, elevated plasma CRP levels had a significant positive linear correlation with depression severity as measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (r = 0.887, P = 0.001). CRP levels in atypical depression were found to be higher than in melancholic depression, but no association was found between depression and markers of inflammation [29]. Inflammation and depression have a bidirectional relationship, with proinflammatory cytokines acting directly on emotion-regulating brain structures involved in depression. Recent Mendelian randomization analyses suggest that IL-6 and CRP are likely to be causally linked with depression [22, 30]. CRP does not cross the blood–brain barrier, but it may increase permeability to molecules such as proinflammatory cytokines, which could be an indicator of inflammatory status in the brain. Proinflammatory cytokines can influence neurotransmitter signalling by increasing the number and function of serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine reuptake pumps, resulting in diminished levels of these neurotransmitters within the synaptic cleft. Interferon-a treatment has been shown to increase cortisol and glucocorticoid resistance, which correlates with an increase in depressive symptoms [31, 32].

Sensitivity and specificity of C-reactive protein (CRP) serum level in diagnosis of MDD

In this study, ROC analysis was done for the MDD and control groups, and the results showed the diagnostic ability of the CRP. The best sensitivity/specificity balance was observed for the CRP (93.3% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity at the cut-off point ≥ 106.50), and the P-value was < 0.001. This means that CRP might be a biological marker for the diagnosis of MDD [33].

C-reactive protein (CRP) serum level sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of bipolar depression

Similarly, ROC analysis was done for the BD and control groups, and the results showed the diagnostic ability of the CRP; the best sensitivity/specificity balance was observed for the CRP (93.3% sensitivity and 96.7% specificity at the cut-off point ≥ 106.50) and a P-value < 0.001. This means that CRP may be a biological marker for BD, associated with inflammation and mood states [34].

Sensitivity and specificity of C-reactive protein (CRP) serum levels to differentiate between unipolar and bipolar depression

The results of the ROC analysis conducted in the MDD and BD groups in this research indicated that there is no diagnostic value between MDD and BD disorder, with a non-statistically significant P = 0.790 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.480 (95% confidence interval = 0.331–0.629). In contrast to these findings, earlier research found that CRP levels could be used as a biomarker to distinguish between MDD and bipolar disorder in both their depressed and euthymic states [35, 36]. The relatively small sample size of this study may be the cause of its statistical insignificance.

Linear regression analysis showing the association of high levels of CRP with BDI scores

As in previous GENDEP studies, simple linear regression analysis revealed that CRP level was the mean predictor of Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) scale score (R-square = 0.788 and P = 0.001) [37]. On the other hand, Lamers et al. [38] found that CRP neither predicted depression nor predicted subsequent CRP levels.

Limitations of the study

  • ▪ The sample size is relatively small; hence, additional studies with a larger randomized sample would help provide more precise data representing the study group.

  • ▪ Confounders other than metabolic syndrome parameters, such as diet, caffeine intake, and smoking, were not controlled for.

  • ▪ The current study assessed the current episode of the mood disorder and not its lifetime prevalence. So, follow-up studies may be needed after remission of episodes to explore the relationship between CRP and MDD and BD.

  • ▪ Participants with illicit drugs, substance use disorders, or other psychiatric disorders have been excluded from the study.

Conclusion

CRP is significantly increased in MDD and BD compared with controls. A non-statistically significant difference was detected between the MDD and BD groups regarding the severity of depression and CRP levels. On assessing the CRP levels of the sample, it was found that individuals with higher CRP levels had depression that was more severe. This association was more pronounced in women than in men. CRP has a positive linear correlation with MDD and BD, but the study was unable to establish CRP as a distinguishing marker between BD and MDD because the sample was small.

Availability of data and materials

On reasonable request, the datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

CRP:

C-reactive protein

MDD:

Major depressive disorder

BD:

Bipolar disorder

BDI:

Beck Depression Inventory

TNF:

Tumour necrosis factor

IL-6:

Interleukin-6

DSM-5:

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders-5th Edition

SCID:

Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Disorders

References

  1. Fond G, Hamdani N, Kapczinski F, Boukouci W, Drancourt N, Dargel A et al (2014) Effectiveness and tolerance of antinflammantory drugs’ add-on therapy in major mental disorders: a systematic qualitative review. Acta Psychiatr Scand 129:163–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haapakoski R, Mathieu J, Ebmeier KP, Alenius H, Kivimäkia M (2015) Cumulative meta-analysis of interleukins 6 and 1β, tumour necrosis factor α and C-reactive protein in patients with major depressive disorder. Brain Behav Immun 49:206–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2015.06.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. McFadyen JD, Kiefer J, Braig D, Loseff-Silver J, Potempa LA, Eisenhardt SU, Peter K (2018) Dissociation of C-reactive proteinlocalizes and amplifies inflammation: evidence for a direct biological role of C-reactive protein and its conformational changes. Front Immunol 9:1351

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Shrive AK, Gheetham GMT, Holden D, Myles DAA, Turnell WG, Volanakis JE and Pepys M B, Bloomer C, Greenhough TJ (1996) Three-dimensional structure of human C-reactive protein. Nat Struct Mol Biol 3:346–354. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsb0496-346

  5. Calabro P, Chang DW, Willerson JT, Yeh ET (2005) Release of C-reactive protein in response to inflammatory cytokines by human adipocytes: linking obesity to vascular inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(6):1112–1113

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yasojima K, Schwab C, McGeer EG, McGeer PL (2000) Human neurons generate C-reactive protein and amyloid P: upregulation in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res 887(1):80–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sproston NR, Ashworth JJ (2018) Role of C-reactive protein at sites of inflammation and infection. Front Immunol 9:754

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Kemalasari I, Fitri NA, Sinto R, Tahapary DL, Harbuwono DS (2022) Effect of calorie restriction diet on levels of C reactive protein (CRP) in obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Metab Syndr 16(3):102388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Myburgh PH, Nienaber-Rousseau C, Kruger IM, Towers GW (2020) Education, smoking and CRP genetics in relation to C-reactive protein concentrations in Black South Africans. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(18):6646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Wium-Andersen MK, Ørsted DD, Nielsen SF, Nordestgaard BG (2013) Elevated C-reactive protein levels, psychological distress, and depression in 73, 131 individuals. JAMA Psychiat 70(2):176–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hannestad J, DellaGioia N, Bloch M (2011) The effect of antidepressant medication treatment on serum levels of inflammatory cytokines: a meta-analysis. Neuropsychopharmacology 36(12):2452–2459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hatata H, Abou Zeid M, Asaad T, Okasha T (2004) Dual diagnosis in substance use, a study in an Egyptian sample (MD), Ain Shams, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abdel-Khalek AM (1998) Internal consistency of an Arabic adaptation of the Beck Depression Inventory in four Arabic countries. Psychol Rep 82:264–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoo ZH, Candlish J, Teare D (2017) What is an ROC curve? Emerg Med J 34:357–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rowland TA, Marwaha S (2018) Epidemiology and risk factors for bipolar disorder. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol 8(9):251–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/2045125318769235. PMCID: PMC6116765, PMID: 30181867

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Schaakxs R, Comijs HC, Lamers F, Kok RM, Beekman ATF, Penninx BWJH (2018) Associations between age and the course of major depressive disorder: a 2-year longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Psychiatry 5(7):581–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30166-4. PMID: 29887519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nivoli AM, Pacchiarotti I, Rosa AR, Popovic D, Murru A, Valenti M et al (2011) Gender differences in a cohort study of 604 bipolar patients: the role of predominant polarity. J Affect Disord 133(3):443–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nandi DN, Banerjee G, Mukherjee SP, Ghosh A, Nandi PS, Nandi S (2000) Psychiatric morbidity of a rural Indian community changes over a 20 year interval. British J Psychiatry 176:351–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Furukawa TA, Konno W, Morinobu S, Harai H, Kitamura T, Takahashi K (2000) Course and outcome of depressive episodes: comparison between bipolar, unipolar and subthreshold depression. Psychiatry Res 96(3):211–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mitchell P, Parker G, Jamieson K, Wilhelm K, Hickie I, Brodaty H et al (1992) Are there any differences between bipolar and unipolar melancholia? J Affect Disord 25(2):97–105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Banerjee S, Varma RP (2013) Factors affecting non-adherence among patients diagnosed with unipolar depression in a psychiatric department of a tertiary hospital in Kolkata, India. Depress Res Treat. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/809542. Epub 2013 Dec 4. PMID: 24381752 PMCID: PMC3868196

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Karidi MV, Vassilopoulou D, Savvidou E, Vitoratou S, Maillis A, Rabavilas A et al (2015) Bipolar disorder and self-stigma: a comparison with schizophrenia. J Affect Disord 184:209–215

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Beckett CW, Niklison-Chirou MV (2022) The role of immunomodulators in treatment-resistant depression: case studies. Cell Death Discov 8(1):367. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-022-01147-6. PMCID: PMC9385739, PMID: 35977923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Osimo EF, Baxter LJ, Lewis G, Jones PB, Khandaker GM (2019) Prevalence of low-grade inflammation in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of CRP levels. Psychol Med 49:1958–1970

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Raison CL (2017) The promise and limitations of anti-inflammatory agents for the treatment of major depressive disorder. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 31:287–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang TL, Lin FC (2007) High-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in patients with major depressive disorder and bipolarmania. Progr Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 31:370–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Danner M, Kasl SV, Abramson JL, Vaccarino V (2003) Association between depression and elevated C-reactive protein. Psychosom Med 65(3):347–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vogelzangs N, Duivis HE, Beekman ATF, Kluft C, Neuteboom J, Hoogendijk W et al (2012) Association of depressive disorders, depression characteristics and antidepressant medication with inflammation. Transl Psychiatry 2(2):e79

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Elovainio M, Aalto AM, Kivimäki M, Pirkola S, Sundvall J, Lönnqvist J et al (2009) Depression and C-reactive protein: population-based Health 2000 Study. Psychosom Med 71(4):423–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Steptoe A, Breeze E, Banks J, Nazroo J (2013) Cohort profile: the English longitudinal study of ageing. Int J Epidemiol 42:1640–1648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ye Z, Kappelmann N, Moser S, Smith GD, Burgess S, Jones PB, Khandaker GM (2021) Role of inflammation in depression and anxiety: tests for disorder specificity, linearity and potential causality of association in the UK Biobank. EClinicalMedicine 38:100992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100992. PMID: 34505025 PMCID: PMC8413248

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Raison CL, Felger JC, Miller AH (2013) Inflammation and treatment resistance in major depression: theperfect storm. Psychiatr Times 30(9). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289325028

  33. Goldsmith DR, Haroon E, Woolwine BJ, Jung MY, Wommack EC, Harvey PD et al (2016) Inflammatory markers are associated with decreased psychomotor speed in patients with major depressive disorder. Brain Behav Immun 56:281–288

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Dargel AA, Godin O, Kapczinski F, Kupfer DJ, Leboyer M (2015) C-reactive protein alterations in bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 76:142–150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chang HH, Wang TY, Lee IH, Lee SY, Chen KC, Huang SY et al (2017) C-reactive protein: a differential biomarker for major depressive disorder and bipolar II disorder. World J Biol Psychiatry 18(1):63–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hung Chi M, Hua Chang H, Tzeng NS, Huang SY, Chou KR, Chun Tsai H et al (2013) The prevalence of metabolic syndrome in drug-naive bipolar II disorder patients ~before and after twelve week pharmacological intervention. J Affect Disord 146:79–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Uher R, Tansey KE, Dew T, Maier W, Mors O, Hauser J et al (2014) An inflammatory biomarker as a differential predictor of outcome of depression treatment with escitalopram and nortriptyline. Am J Psychiatry 171(12):1278–1286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lamers F, Milaneschi Y, de Jonge P, Giltay EJ, Penninx BWJH (2018) Metabolic and inflammatory markers: associations with individual depressive symptoms. Psychol Med 48(7):1102–1110

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the participants in the research.

Funding

This research was not funded by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt

    Hani Hamed Dessoki, Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezzat Abdelhakim & Hisham Salah

  2. Department of Clinical and Chemical Pathology, Beni-Suef University, Beni Suef, Egypt

    Rasha Abd El Razek Khattab

  3. El-Menia Mental Health Hospital, Beni Suef, Egypt

    Wagdy Moris

  4. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef City, Egypt

    Alshimaa Mohsen Mohamed Lotfy

Authors
  1. Hani Hamed Dessoki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rasha Abd El Razek Khattab
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wagdy Moris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmed Abdelaziz Ezzat Abdelhakim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alshimaa Mohsen Mohamed Lotfy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hisham Salah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HD, contributed to the idea, study design, questionnaire design, and writing; RK, data collection and writing; WM, data collection and curation, software, editing, and writing; AA, conceptualization, methodology, software, and writing; AL, conducted the statistical analysis, original draft preparation, and reviewing and editing; and HS, writing, original draft preparation, and reviewing. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alshimaa Mohsen Mohamed Lotfy.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Medical Research Committee (FWA00015574) Faculty of Medicine, Beni-Suef University, and participants were informed that participation is voluntary and does not imply a direct benefit. The results of the study could be used as a scientific publication, but the identity of the participant will be kept confidential.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dessoki, H.H., Khattab, R.A.E.R., Moris, W. et al. C-reactive protein as a biomarker for unipolar versus bipolar depression: a cross-sectional study. Middle East Curr Psychiatry 30, 69 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-023-00342-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-023-00342-0

Keywords