Skip to main content
Middle East Current Psychiatry
Download PDF

Psychosocial and clinical impact of COVID-19 pandemic and its relationship to the quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study, Egypt

Middle East Current Psychiatry volume 29, Article number: 16 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Data have been pouring on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with chronic diseases. This study aimed to address the relationship between the perceived fears of COVID-19 virus (FCV), psychological status, and quality of life (QoL) among patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) during the pandemic. This study included 100 patients with RA and an equal number of control subjects, who were recruited from Zagazig University rheumatology outpatient clinics, Egypt. All subjects were interviewed using the fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S), Symptom Checklist-90 scale (SCL-90), and World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale (WHOQOL-BREF). Patients were additionally assessed using the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) and Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ).

Results

There were significant differences between both groups in all QoL domains and most psychological dimensions. Most patients with RA experienced moderate-to-high disease activity and mild-to-moderate functional impairment (85% and 80%, respectively). FCV was correlated with the number of family members (P-value 0.020), and obsessive-compulsive (P-value 0.006), interpersonal sensitivity (P-value 0.035), hostility (P-value 0.017), phobia (P-value 0.010), and psychoticism (P-value 0.034) symptoms. Moderate-to-high disease activity was associated with reduced psychological QoL. Patients with moderate-to-severe functional impairment had worse QoL in all domains (except social). Prolonged illness duration was associated with worse social QoL.

Conclusions

QoL was adversely affected in patients with RA during the pandemic. There was a robust relationship between FCV and the emergence of psychological symptoms. RA-related clinical factors like illness duration, disease activity, and functional disability were associated with reduced QoL in those patients.

Background

Since the initial outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 from Wuhan Province in China in December 2019 [1], the epidemic had a rapid global spread worldwide which led the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare the disease a global health emergency at the end of January 2020 and a pandemic in March 2020 [2]. During the outbreak, a wide array of psychosocial symptoms was observed in various populations, such as the fear of contracting an infection or the fear of death as well as feelings of despair and social isolation [3,4,5].

Given the lack of specific protocols for the treatment of COVID-19 infection, the current therapies were primarily supportive, even though several agents are now waiting for approval for the treatment of this life-threatening disease. RA is a chronic autoimmune disease with a progressive and debilitating course, and common psychological comorbidities [6]. The COVID-19 pandemic is expected to change the treatment strategies of a chronic disorder like RA, whose patients are at an increased infectious risk compared to the general population owing to their immune suppression of being an autoimmune disease as well as the effect of medications like corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive drugs [7].

Being at higher risk to get the COVID-19 infection, the fear of COVID-19 (FCV) among patients with RA was supposed to be intensified. It was well reported that FCV had a negative impact on overall well-being, with intensified levels of depression, anxiety, and stress [8]. Likewise, psychiatric comorbidities (e.g., depression) would be associated with higher disease activity, including reduced pain tolerance [9], and increased levels of functional disability, which eventually resulted in poorer long-term outcomes, and reduced quality of life (QoL) [10]. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) had reported increased levels of anxiety in patients receiving steroids and other RA medications including methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine during the current pandemic [11].

Although it was hypothesized that the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated correlates would adversely influence the physical and psychological status of patients with chronic diseases [12], research investigating the relationship between the perceived FCV and other associated psychological symptoms secondary to the pandemic, and the QoL in patients with RA in Egypt, is still lagging. The aim of this study was primarily to assess the psychosocial and clinical impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with RA in Egypt and to compare these findings with their healthy counterparts.

Methods

Study setting, design, and sampling

This case-control study was conducted at the rheumatology outpatient clinics of the Zagazig University hospitals in Sharkia province, Egypt, from October 1st, 2020, to March 31st, 2021. The sample size was calculated according to a 95% confidence interval (CI), at 80% power of the study, the ratio of sample size 1:1. The patient group included a total of 100 subjects diagnosed as patients with RA if they had scored 6 or more points based on the rheumatoid arthritis criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) collaborative initiative [13]. Patients aged from 18 to 60 years, of both sexes, and able to give consent, were included in the study. An equal number of healthy subjects, who were age and sex-matched, were enrolled as a control group. All subjects were consecutively selected using a convenience sampling method. All participants with a confirmed history of psychiatric disorders (before the pandemic), based on the history taken or their medical records, were excluded from this study. Moreover, participants with concurrent major neurocognitive disorders, intellectual disabilities, and/or substance use disorders were excluded, as their presence would affect the credibility to participate in the study. All procedures were conducted within the ethical guidelines outlined in the declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments, and all participants were requested to sign an informed consent after explaining the study objectives and procedures.

Assessment measures

Using a semi-structured checklist, all study participants were interviewed to collect demographic and COVID-19-related data. The COVID-19-related data included questions about whether the participants or their close family members were previously infected with the COVID-19 virus, history of COVID-19 mortality among close relatives, and whether they were compliant or not with the COVID-19 precautions like social distancing or protective equipment measures.

Psychological assessment of study participants

Symptom Checklist-90 scale (SCL-90)

SCL-90 was used as a descriptive measure of psychopathology detecting the current symptom severity in various patient populations. The concurrent psychological symptoms in patients with RA during the pandemic, screened by the SCL-90 checklist, might be considered as potential confounders related to the reaction to the pandemic or the illness itself. SCL-90 included ninety questions answered by the participants on a five-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (none) to 4 (extreme) representing the nine symptom dimensions for the past 1 month: namely, somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism. Additionally, there were three global indices: namely Global Severity Index (GSI), which was the mean sum of the 90 items, Positive Symptom Distress Index (PSDI), which was the mean sum of only the above-zero items, and lastly, Positive Symptoms Total (PST), which was the number of the above-zero items [14, 15].

Fear of COVID-19 scale (FCV-19S)

FCV-19S was a new short valid seven-item psychometric scale used to assess the participants’ intensified anxiety and fear of COVID-19 infection. The participants used a five-item Likert-type response to indicate their level of agreement with each statement. The score for each question ranged from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with a total score ranging from 7 to 35. The higher the score, the greater the fear of coronavirus-19 [16, 17].

World Health Organization quality of life scale (WHOQOL-BREF)

WHOQOL-BREF was used to assess the quality of life (QoL). It was composed of a total of 26 questions based on a four-domain structure: physical health, psychological, social relationships, environment. Items were answered on a 5-point scale with a 2-week timeframe. The mean of items within each domain was multiplied by four to yield the domain score (ranging from 0 to100), and the higher scores indicate higher QoL [18, 19].

Clinical assessment of patients with RA

The following measurement tools were applied to assess the clinical impact of the pandemic as well as the COVID-19-related factors like associated fear, anxiety, and depression on the physical status, disease activity, and functioning of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In this study, the clinical impact was assessed using the following measures:

Disease activity score 28 (DAS28)

DAS28 was used to assess RA disease activity [20]. It is a short scale derived from the original DAS with the inclusion of fewer joints. It consisted of a 28 tender joint count (ranged from 0 to 28), a 28-swollen joint count (ranged from 0 to 28), ESR, and GH on a VAS scale (ranged from 0 to 100). DAS28 was scored as a continuous index ranging from 2 to 10, where the patients were divided into four disease activity grades (remission, low, moderate, and high activity) [21].

Modified health assessment questionnaire (MHAQ)

MHAQ was a self-reported outcome questionnaire and used to measure the functional status of patients with RA. It included questions about the perceived patient’s satisfaction regarding the same daily activities, as well as the change in the degree of difficulty. Patients were divided into normal, mild, moderate, and severe according to their functional status [22].

Statistical analysis

SPSS program (Statistical Package for Social Science) version 18.0 was used to analyze the collected data. The differences between the qualitative variables between groups were estimated using the Chi-square test (χ2). Paired Student test (t-test) was used for comparison between two groups for continuous variables and the Mann-Whitney-U (MWU) test for non-normally distributed data. To evaluate the correlation between two variables that had a linear relationship, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was applied. Results were considered significant when their probability was less than 5% (P<0.05).

Results

Demographic and psychological characteristics of study participants

The study included a total of two-hundred subjects (one hundred patients with RA and an equal number of normal subjects as a control group). The mean age of RA patients was 43.4 ± 10.0 years while that of the control group was 41.4 ± 10.2 years. About one-fourth of patients with RA reported that they or one of their close relatives were previously confirmed as COVID-19 patients. There were significant differences between patients with RA and the control group in terms of education, working status, comorbid organic diseases, and compliance with COVID-19 precautions. Patients with RA, compared with their normal counterparts, were more likely to be less educated ((53% vs 11%), unemployed (87% vs 47%), having a history of comorbid organic diseases (32% vs 19%), and more compliant with COVID-19 precautions (75% vs 33%).

The means of physical, psychological, social, and environmental QoL domains of patients with RA were significantly lower than those reported by control subjects. Similarly, the mean scores of symptoms of somatization, obsession and compulsion, depression, anxiety, phobia, paranoia, and psychoticism were much higher among patients with RA than control subjects. However, despite higher in patients with RA, there was no difference between both groups in terms of FCV, as illustrated in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1 Demographic and COVID-19 related factors of patients with RA and Control Subjects
Full size table
Table 2 Associated psychological symptoms and quality of life in patients with RA and Control Subjects
Full size table

Perceived fear of COVID-19 infection, demographic, clinical, and psychological factors in patients with RA

It was found that about 80%, 86%, and 5% of the patients with RA received steroids, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) as hydroxychloroquine or methotrexate, and immunosuppressants as cyclosporine, respectively. Moreover, 17% of patients stated that they were not compliant with their medications during the previous 6 months before the study. As shown in Fig. 1, most patients with RA had experienced moderate-to-high disease activity (85%), as scored by DAS28, and mild-to-moderate functional impairment (80%), according to MHAQ. Moreover, the perceived FCV was correlated with increased number of family members (r 0.23, P-value 0.020), and symptoms of obsession and compulsion (r 0.27, P-value 0.006), interpersonal sensitivity (r 0.21, P-value 0.035), hostility (r 0.24, P-value 0.017), phobia (r 0.26, P-value 0.010), and psychoticism (r 0.20, P-value 0.034), as illustrated in Tables 3 and 4.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Clinical characteristics of patients with RA

Full size image
Table 3 Correlation between perceived fear of COVID-19 infection, and demographic, clinical, and COVID-19-related factors of patients with RA
Full size table
Table 4 Correlation between perceived fear of COVID-19 infection and associated psychological symptoms and quality of life in patients with RA
Full size table

QoL was found to be likely affected by the RA-related clinical factors. Moderate-to-high disease activity was associated with lesser scores of psychological and total QoL. Also, patients with moderate-to-severe functional impairment reported worse QoL in all domains (except social). Lastly, increased illness duration was associated with worse social QoL (r 0.26, P-value 0.010), as illustrated in Table 5.

Table 5 Relationship between illness related clinical factors and quality of life in patients with RA
Full size table

Discussion

This study aimed primarily to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with RA. Those patients showed significantly higher adherence to COVID-19 regulations than the healthy ones. Being chronic patients with a higher risk of poor COVID-19 outcomes, they were supposed to follow strict social distancing measures (24). However, this strict social distancing would crucially increase loneliness, exacerbate anxiety, and depression among those patients.

The pandemic had led to increased rates of fear, anxiety, depression, and social isolation in the various populations, which all would be magnified in patients with chronic diseases [12, 23]. It was observed that during the initial phase of the coronavirus outbreak, in the general population, increased numbers of individuals reported higher levels of anxiety and depressive symptoms [24]. Another study of patients with RA in New York City reported increased fatigue, stress, anxiety, cognitive worsening, and musculoskeletal symptoms. In addition, patients expressed worries about medication changes, family, work, and finances [25]. In the current study, patients with RA had more psychological symptoms than control subjects. Likewise, FCV was correlated with most psychological symptom dimensions of SCL-90, as well as the number of family members. This would be, in part, attributed to the financial burden related to the economic influence of the pandemic on the large-sized families, as well as the propensity of contracting COVID-19 infection that would eventually add additional psychological stress on the individuals with RA during the pandemic [26]. Moreover, it was intuitively supposed that even before the COVID era, depression, and anxiety symptoms were frequently observed in patients with RA [27]. Nonetheless, the increased severity of psychological symptoms during the pandemic would be explained in the view of the early reports since the pandemic, which suggested that those patients are at a higher risk of respiratory failure and death from COVID-19 [28, 29]. The patients were warned by the Centre for Disease Control (CDC) to be more cautious during the pandemic owing to their reduced immune status [30]. Also, patients with RA would face unique challenges during the pandemic rather than the concerns of contracting the infection itself. Early propaganda on hydroxychloroquine, one of the drugs used to treat RA, promoted as a potential COVID-19 prophylactic and treatment agent, resulted in drug shortages for patients with rheumatic diseases, including RA. Other difficulties included problems accessing care due to the lockdown [23, 31].

In this study, patients with RA, during the pandemic, experienced a reduced quality of life for RA when compared to healthy individuals. RA was a chronic disabling condition that could impair work productivity and activities of daily living and compromise the well-being of patients [32]. It was found that patients with RA would experience a certain degree of functional impairment (in this study, 80% of patients had mild-to-moderate functional impairment), and this impairment would increase health care expenses, decrease the quality of life, and strongly predict depression and increased suicide risk [33].

RA itself had a substantial effect on QoL. This study showed a strong relationship between the illness duration, activity and functional status, and QoL. In RA, it was postulated that the burden of the disease would depend on both emotional and physical components with subsequent impact on overall well-being [34]. In line with these results, a study conducted on 170 patients with RA found that patients with worse disease activity were likely to experience more severe depressive symptoms [35]. Therefore, routine assessment of the disease’s overall impact on a patient’s life, including assessment of emotional status and QoL, was recommended in several recent guidelines. These guidelines advocated that evaluation of treatment success should not only be seen from a clinical perspective but should include a patient’s overall quality of life. Thus, a shift should be done from merely the strict medical/symptom-related model to restoring or at least improving the quality of life [36].

Limitations

This study had a few limitations. The cross-sectional design of this study and the potentially brief duration of assessment would infer the conclusion of the causality of the impact of COVID-19 on those populations. However, it would be argued that this study would be one of few studies, if any, in Egypt which addressed QoL and other related factors among patients with RA during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future large-sized longitudinal studies, perhaps including psychological interventions, would be warranted. Another concern was the lack of multicentric character that would limit the generalizability of results. The authors advocated that the Zagazig University Hospitals, located in Sharkia Province, were one of the largest general health facilities serving around seven million inhabitants in the eastern delta, Egypt.

Conclusions

Psychological status and QoL were adversely affected in patients with RA during the pandemic. RA-related clinical factors like illness duration, disease activity, and impaired functional status were all associated with reduced QoL. Moreover, there was a robust relationship between the perceived fear of COVID-19 and the emergence of more psychological symptoms in patients with RA. The study results would shed the light on the potential impact of the pandemic on the QoL of patients with chronic diseases, particularly RA. Also, it highlights the need to develop routine screening interviews for the associated psychological and physical health-related issues that should be regularly applied during and after this pandemic. It should include early monitoring, assessment, and management for the potentially emerging psychological symptoms.

Availability of data and materials

The data collected and analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

FCV:

Fear of COVID-19 virus

FCV-19S:

Fear of COVID-19 scale

GSI:

Global Severity Index

PSDI:

Positive Symptom Distress Index

QoL:

Quality of life

RA:

Rheumatoid arthritis

SCL-90:

Symptom Checklist-90 scale

WHOQOL-BREF:

World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale

References

  1. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG et al (2020) A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 579(7798):270–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang C, Horby PW, Hayden FG, Gao GF (2020) A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet 395(10223):470–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30185-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Abdelghani M, Hassan MS, Elgohary HM, Fouad E (2021) Exploring the factors associated with coronaphobia among physicians during the COVID-19 outbreak in Egypt. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 57(1):105–105. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-021-00357-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aljemaiah AI, Osman M, Alharbi S et al (2021) Fear at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic: validation of the Arabic version of the four-dimensional symptom questionnaire among Saudi-based respondents. BJPsych Open 7:e33. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abdelghani M, Hassan MS, Alsadik ME, Abdelmoaty AA, Said A, Atwa SA (2021) Post-traumatic stress symptoms among an Egyptian sample of post-remission COVID-19 survivors: prevalence and sociodemographic and clinical correlates. Middle East Curr Psychiatry 28(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-021-00102-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Silva CFR, Duarte C, Ferreira RJO, Santos E, da Silva JAP (2020) Depression, disability and sleep disturbance are the main explanatory factors of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a path analysis model. Clin Exp Rheumatol 38(2):314–321

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Caso F, Costa L, Ruscitti P et al (2020) Could Sars-coronavirus-2 trigger autoimmune and/or autoinflammatory mechanisms in genetically predisposed subjects? Autoimmun Rev 19(5):102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sood S (2020) Psychological effects of the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic. Res Human Med Educ 7(11):23–26

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chancay MG, Guendsechadze SN, Blanco I (2019) Types of pain and their psychosocial impact in women with rheumatoid arthritis. Women's Midlife Health 5(1):3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40695-019-0047-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ji J, Zhang L, Zhang Q et al (2017) Functional disability associated with disease and quality-of-life parameters in Chinese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes 15(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0659-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Landewé RBM, Machado PM, Kroon F et al (2020) EULAR provisional recommendations for the management of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases in the context of SARS-CoV-2. Ann Rheum Dis 79(7):851. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217877

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdelghani M, Hamed MG, Said A, Fouad E (2021) Evaluation of perceived fears of COVID-19 virus infection and its relationship to health-related quality of life among patients with diabetes mellitus in Egypt during pandemic: a developing country single-center study. Diabetol Int 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13340-021-00511-8

  13. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ et al (2010) 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 62(9):2569–2581. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.27584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Derogatis LR, Unger R (2010) Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology, pp 1–2

    Google Scholar 

  15. El Behairy A (2004) Symptom check List-90-revised: the Arabic version. The Anglo Egyptian Bookshop, Cairo

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ahorsu DK, Lin C-Y, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths MD, Pakpour AH (2020) The fear of COVID-19 scale: development and initial validation. Int J Ment Heal Addict 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8

  17. Alyami M, Henning M, Krägeloh CU, Alyami H (2020) Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the fear of COVID-19 scale. Int J Ment Heal Addict 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-020-00316-x

  18. WHO Group (1998) Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med 28(3):551–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ohaeri JU, Awadalla AW (2009) The reliability and validity of the short version of the WHO quality of life instrument in an Arab general population. Ann Saudi Med 29(2):98–104

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Prevoo ML, van’t Hof MA, Kuper HH, van Leeuwen MA, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL (1995) Modified disease activity scores that include twenty-eight-joint counts. Development and validation in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 38(1):44–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780380107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Gestel AM, Haagsma CJ, van Riel PL (1998) Validation of rheumatoid arthritis improvement criteria that include simplified joint counts. Arthritis Rheum 41(10):1845–1850 https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199810)41:10<1845::aid-art17>3.0.co;2-k

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pincus T, Summey JA, Soraci SA Jr, Wallston KA, Hummon NP (1983) Assessment of patient satisfaction in activities of daily living using a modified Stanford health assessment questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum 26(11):1346–1353. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780261107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Michaud K, Wipfler K, Shaw Y et al (2020) Experiences of patients with rheumatic diseases in the United States during early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. ACR Open Rheumatol 2(6):335–343. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11148

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang C, Pan R, Wan X et al (2020) Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729

  25. Mancuso CA, Duculan R, Jannat-Khah D, Barbhaiya M, Bass AR, Mehta B (2020) Rheumatic disease-related symptoms during the height of the. COVID-19 pandemic 16(Suppl 1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-020-09798-w

  26. Prime H, Wade M, Browne DT (2020) Risk and resilience in family well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am Psychol 75(5):631–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tee CA, Salido EO, Reyes PWC, Ho RC, Tee ML (2020) Psychological state and associated factors during the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic among Filipinos with rheumatoid arthritis or systemic lupus erythematosus. Open Access Rheumatol 12:215–222. https://doi.org/10.2147/oarrr.s269889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ye C, Cai S, Shen G et al (2020) Clinical features of rheumatic patients infected with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Ann Rheum Dis 79(8):1007–1013. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K et al (2020) Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. 584(7821):430–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2521-4

  30. CDC COVID-19 Response Team (2020) Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) - United States, February 12-march 16, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 69(12):343–346. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6912e2

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sattui SE, Liew JW, Graef ER et al (2020) Swinging the pendulum: lessons learned from public discourse concerning hydroxychloroquine and COVID-19. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 16(7):659–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666x.2020.1792778

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Taylor PC, Moore A, Vasilescu R, Alvir J, Tarallo M (2016) A structured literature review of the burden of illness and unmet needs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a current perspective. Rheumatol Int 36(5):685–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-015-3415-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Bhatia A, Kc M, Gupta L (2021) Increased risk of mental health disorders in patients with RA during the COVID-19 pandemic: a possible surge and solutions. Rheumatol Int 41(5):843–850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-021-04829-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Nicassio PM, Kay MA, Custodio MK, Irwin MR, Olmstead R, Weisman MH (2011) An evaluation of a biopsychosocial framework for health-related quality of life and disability in rheumatoid arthritis. J Psychosom Res 71(2):79–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2011.01.008

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Mostafa H, Radwan A (2013) The relationship between disease activity and depression in Egyptian patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Egyptian Rheumatol 35(4):193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Russell AS (2008) Quality-of-life assessment in rheumatoid arthritis. PharmacoEconomics 26(10):831–846. https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200826100-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

All authors would like to acknowledge all study participants for their active participation in this study.

Funding

This research did not receive financial support from any funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Psychiatry Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Mervat S. Hassan, Mohamed Abdelghani & Dina A. Seleem

  2. Rheumatology and Rehabilitation Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt

    Dalia I. Mostafa, Enas I. Abdelhady & Shymaa A. Sarhan

  3. 2015-2016 Hubert H. Humphrey Fellowship, Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA

    Mohamed Abdelghani

Authors
  1. Mervat S. Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dalia I. Mostafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Enas I. Abdelhady
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shymaa A. Sarhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Mohamed Abdelghani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dina A. Seleem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M.A. was responsible for the research conceptualization and proposal design; E.I.A., S.A.S., and D.I.M. contributed to the data collection, formal analysis, and interpretation; M.S.H and D.A.S. were responsible for writing and editing the original manuscript; and M.A. was responsible for the final editing and revision. Lastly, all authors have collectively approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Abdelghani.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Zagazig University institutional review board (IRB no. 6372-23-9-2020). Informed written consent was obtained from all participants after explaining the study objectives and measures and assuring confidentiality.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hassan, M.S., Mostafa, D.I., Abdelhady, E.I. et al. Psychosocial and clinical impact of COVID-19 pandemic and its relationship to the quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study, Egypt. Middle East Curr Psychiatry 29, 16 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-022-00184-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-022-00184-2

Keywords

  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Quality of life
  • COVID-19 pandemic
  • Egypt