Skip to main content

Smartphone addiction and its relation to social phobia in female university students



The problematic smartphone use has emerged with negative mental health consequences. The current study aims to assess the rate of occurrence of smartphone addiction and the relationship between smartphone addiction and social phobia and its severity in a sample of female university students.


Out of 540 female students, 28.7% have severe smartphone addiction with higher number in students of academic faculties; also, 71.86% of the whole sample have social phobia with 22.78%, 21.85%, 16.3%, and 10.93% reported mild, moderate, severe, and very severe social phobia scores respectively. The number of students reporting very severe social phobia in the academic group is higher than that in the practical group; also, the study shows a significant relation between smartphone addiction and social phobia.

Conclusion and implications

There is a high rate of distribution of social phobia in young adult females, which is accompanied with increased in a high rate of occurrence of smartphone addiction; so, there is a need for raising the public awareness regarding hazards of problematic smartphone use in students and the importance of screening of different psychiatric disorders, as social phobia in such population.


Social phobia is a disabling mental health problem that begins before or during adolescence; it is usually associated with significant impairment as it increases the risk of dropout from school, work absence, unemployment, and utilization of social welfare, causing significant financial costs in the society and reduced quality of life. Among university students, social phobia symptoms arise in a great number of students, or previously existing symptoms increase, and students go into the effort of having himself or herself accepted by others [1].

Smartphone has become an essential part of daily life, and research has shown that certain people become so attached to their device that they experience separation anxiety when it is not with them [2]. Smartphone addiction is considered as one form of technological addictions. Technological addiction is defined as one type of behavior addiction that involves human–machine interaction and is non-chemical in nature. Smartphone addiction consists of four main components: compulsive behaviors, tolerance, withdrawal, and functional impairment [3].

Among factors affecting smartphone use are aversive emotions and negative experiences, as they result in a need for distraction and avoidance of chronic stressors, which may result in addictive behavior; so, anxiety can be a risk factor of problematic smartphone use with strong association between stress, general anxiety, and PSU [4].

Along social interactions, socially anxious people search for reassurance, but they are always afraid of negative evaluations during face-to-face interactions; so, they prefer virtual social interactions as they experienced less social anxiety due to less stress and more reassuring social interactions [5],as a result, they keep checking their smartphones for new messages and updates, and they spend more time on the device on social networking sites due to easy accessibility of virtual online interactions than real face-to-face interactions,also, they feel comfortable with being anonymous especially physically, so higher levels of social anxiety are related to longer time spent using smartphone [6].

Smartphones have both considerable benefits as well as exposure to online risks such as access to inappropriate content and abusive interaction with others, which could have a detrimental effect on mental health [7], these new technologies can lead to depression, social anxiety, and other types of anxiety and sleep disorders such as insomnia, interrupted sleep, and early morning wake up, revealing a significant relation between sleep problems and smartphone addiction. Most common sleep complication among the high-risk group was feeling sleepy during work that affects their efficacy and achievement during work, as they spend night using their smartphones [8].

Drivers who use smartphones while driving pay attention to their mobile not to other road hazards, and this leads to increased risk of accidents such as frequent checking of mobile phone, chatting, and listening to audio; these habits will increase the risk of accidents according to WHO study [9].

Also, holding a smartphone for a long time may cause musculoskeletal complications and smartphone addiction. The distribution of musculoskeletal symptoms or pain of any severity was most common in the neck, followed by the upper back and then the shoulders; as a result, the gait can be affected with abnormal posture of their backbone [10], and the problematic smartphone use may cause financial burden especially among students due to spending part of their budget in charging their Internet data, phone bills which may even exceed their financial limits [11].

The treatment strategies need to focus on engaging smartphone users into more physical activities and into real social networks focusing on face-to-face interactions rather than interacting through social media apps [12], so, children should be encouraged to take up activities that can help them learn self-regulation such as sports, outdoor activities, painting, music, dance, yoga, and meditation [13].

Social anxiety disorder is strongly associated with other mental disorders, comorbidity rate of up to 60% has been reported with the most common comorbidities being other anxiety disorders and affective disorders, especially depression, and also, SAD has been found to be a risk factor for alcohol and cannabis dependency; the distress caused by the comorbidities increases the suicidal behavior of individuals with social phobia [14]. There is a growing body of work demonstrating that SAD is mediated by specific neuro-circuitry, with serotonergic and dopaminergic systems particularly relevant, providing a rationale for the use of pharmacotherapy like serotonin reuptake inhibitors or serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. The glutamatergic and noradrenergic systems, as well as substance P, may also be implicated in the neurological basis of SAD, suggesting a role for agents such as gabapentin, pregabalin, and neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists [15].

Individuals with social phobia had reduced quality of life in all areas of life, including physical and psychological health and social relationships; so, society should realize those negative consequences and also hazards of problematic smartphone use, and so, there is a strong need to raise public awareness regarding both social phobia and smartphone addiction [16].


  • ▪ Type of study: Cross-sectional study

  • ▪ Study setting: The study will be held at different faculties of Ain Shams University, et al.-Abbassia, Cairo.

  • ▪ Study period: Until completion of the sample

  • ▪ Study population: Female students at the Ain Shams University

  • ▪ The study included only Egyptian female students who accepted to participate in the study with age range from 18 to 25 years and owns a smartphone; meanwhile, students with medical, neurological, and mental illness due to medical illness or mental illness due to substance or medications were excluded.

  • ▪ Sampling method: Stratified random sampling of female students of first grade from two practical faculties (Faculty of Medicine and Faculty of Sciences) and two theoretical faculties (Faculty of Psychology and Faculty of Laws) at Ain Shams University.

  • ▪ Sampling size: Using PASS program, setting alpha error at 5% and power at 90%. Result from previous study [17] showed that the correlation between SAS and BAI is 0.276 (r = 0.276). Based on this, the needed sample is 160 cases with taking in account 20% dropout rate.

Yet, 540 students were recruited, and the sample was taken from two practical faculties and two theoretical faculties divided as 135 students from each faculty.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved by the Ain-Shams University Medical School ethical committee and the scientific committee of neuropsychiatric department. Participants provided written informed consent, which was obtained after the study had been explained in detail, before their participation in the study.


The study included two separate interviews: the first interview lasted for about 1 h for establishing rapport with participants and collecting sociodemographic data and excluding any other psychiatric morbidities except social phobia using SCID I; the second interview lasted for about 1 h also and was for assessment of both smartphone addiction using smartphone addiction scale and social phobia using social phobia inventory.

After collecting sociodemographic data according to the psychiatric sheet of Okasha Institute of Psychiatry, Ain Shams University, participants were assessed by SCID-I to exclude any psychiatric disorders other than social phobia, then, they were assessed by the Social Phobia Inventory to determine the presence and severity of social phobia, also, they were assessed for smartphone addiction severity by the Smartphone Addiction Scale.

Tools used

Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I disorder [18] — Arabic version [19] was used

It is a semi-structured interview guide for making DSM-IV diagnoses, administered by a clinician or trained mental health professional that is familiar with the DSM-IV classification and diagnostic criteria, for diagnostic evaluation, research, and the training of mental-health professionals; our study used the Arabic version of the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis I diagnosis [19].

Smartphone addiction scale [20] — Arabic version [21] was used

It is a scale for smartphone addiction that consisted of 6 factors and 33 items with a 6-point Likert scale (1: “strongly disagree” and 6: “strongly agree”) based on self-reporting. The six factors are daily-life disturbance, positive anticipation, withdrawal, cyberspace-oriented relationship, overuse, and tolerance.

Social phobia inventory [22] — Arabic version [23] was used

It is a questionnaire developed by the Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences of Duke University for screening and measuring severity of social anxiety; SPIN is a 17-item self-rating for social anxiety disorder (or social phobia). The scale is rated over the past week and includes items assessing each of the symptom domains of social anxiety disorder (fear, avoidance, and physiologic arousal). A total score of 19 distinguished between social phobia subjects and controls. The SPIN demonstrates solid psychometric properties and shows promise as a measurement for the screening and treatment response of social phobia.

In this study, the Arabic version was used [24].

Statistical methods

The collected data was coded, tabulated, and statistically analyzed using SPSS statistics (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software version 20. Descriptive statistics was done for quantitative data as minimum and maximum of the range as well as mean ± SD (standard deviation), while it was done for qualitative data as number and percentage; regarding analytical statistics, Student’s T-test was used to assess the statistical significance of the difference between two study group means, and chi-square test was used to examine the relationship between two qualitative variables, P-value: level of significance: P > 0.05: non-significant, P < 0.05: significant, and P < 0.01: highly significant. ANOVA test was used to assess the statistical significance of the difference between more than two study group means, correlation analysis (using Pearson’s method): to assess the strength of association between two quantitative variables. The correlation coefficient denoted symbolically “r” defines the strength (magnitude) and direction (positive or negative) of the linear relationship between two variables.


Descriptive analysis

Sociodemographic data

The whole sample was recruited from same age as all students are 18 years old, out of the whole sample of 540 students: regarding residence, 475 student live with their families (87.96%), while 65 (12.04%) live in hostel; regarding marital status, 524 are single (97.04%), and 16 (2.96%) are married; and regarding occupation, only 6.37% of the students are employed, and the majority (94.63%) are unemployed. Considering the faculty specialty, students are enrolled in the faculties of medicine, engineering, law, and psychology specialty (25% for each), regarding the faculty studying type, 50% of the sample is selected from academic field faculties and 50% from practical field faculties, and regarding religion, 511 subjects are Muslim (94.63%), and 29 (5.37%) are Christians (Table 1).

Table 1 Rate of distribution of the sociodemographic data among the whole sample

Social phobia

Using the Social Phobia Scale, results showed that out of 540 students, 152 students (28.15%) had no social phobia, while 388 (%???) students had social phobia distributed as follows: 22.78% reported mild social phobia (score from 21–30 by social phobia inventory), 21.85% had moderate social phobia (scoring 31–40), students with severe social phobia (41–50) constituted 16.3%, and those with very severe social phobia (more than 50) constituted 10.93% of the sample (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Descriptive analysis of social phobia in the sample

Smartphone addiction

Using the Smartphone Addiction Scale (SAS), results showed that the whole participants reported smartphone addiction with mean score of 124.313 (SD = 30.342) and range of 33–192; as the score increases, this indicates higher smartphone addiction.

Comparative analysis

  1. A)

    Social phobia: There is significant difference between living with family and living in dormitory with respect to having social phobia (Table 2).

  2. B)

    Smartphone addiction: There is no significant difference between living with family and living in dormitory regarding smartphone addiction (Table 3).

  3. C)

    Type of study is as follows:

  4. D)

    Regarding social phobia scores: Using T-test to compare the score of social phobia in academic studying students group with that in practical studying students group. It shows that the score of social phobia inventory in the students of academic group is more than that in the students of practical group, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.005).

  5. E)

    Regarding smartphone addiction scores: Using T-test to compare the score of smartphone addiction in academic studying students group with that in practical studying students group, the mean of scores of smartphone addiction scale in the academic studying group exceeds that in the practical studying group with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.005) (Table 4).

Table 2 Social phobia and sociodemographic characteristics
Table 3 Smartphone addiction and sociodemographic characteristics
Table 4 Comparison between academic and practical studying groups regarding social phobia and smartphone addiction

The relation between social phobia and smartphone addiction

  1. a)

    The relation between social phobia and smartphone addiction in the whole sample: Using T-test to determine relation between having social phobia and smartphone addiction, there is significant relation between having social phobia and smartphone addiction (P > 0.001) (Table 5).

Table 5 Relation between having social phobia and smartphone addiction

Using analysis of variance (ANOVA) test to determine relation between social phobia and smartphone in the whole sample, it shows that the severity of smartphone addiction is highly related to the severity of social phobia scores, with a highly statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) (Table 6).

  1. b)

    The relation between social phobia and smartphone addiction among academic and practical studying students type groups: Using T-test to determine relation between having social phobia and smartphone addiction among academic and practical studying groups, there is significant relation between having social phobia and smartphone addiction (Table 7).

Table 6 Smartphone addiction in relation to social phobia severity in the whole sample
Table 7 The relation between having social phobia and smartphone addiction among academic and practical studying type groups

Using analysis of variance (ANOVA) test to determine the relation between social phobia and smartphone addiction among academic and practical studying groups, there is also a highly significant difference between severity of social phobia and smartphone addiction in both groups (P < 0.001 for each) (Table 8).

Table 8 Smartphone addiction in relation to severity of social phobia in academic and practical studying students groups


  1. a)

    The correlation between social phobia and smartphone addiction in the whole sample: Using Pearson correlation to assess correlation between social phobia and smartphone addiction, there is a moderate positive relation between social phobia and smartphone addiction (r = 0.590) with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) (Table 9).

  2. b)

    The correlation between social phobia and smartphone addiction among academic and practical studying type groups: Using Pearson correlation to assess correlation between social phobia and smartphone addiction, there is a positive correlation between social phobia and smartphone addiction in both academic and practical faculties; the correlation is strong in academic studying group (r = 0.609) and moderate in the practical group (r = 0.559), with statistically significant difference between social phobia and smartphone addiction scores in both groups (P < 0.001 for each) (Table 10).

Table 9 Correlation between social phobia and smartphone addiction scores of the whole sample
Table 10 Correlation between social phobia and smartphone addiction scores among academic and practical studying groups


Smartphone addiction has a significant impact on the overall health as well as mental health of individuals, as it leads to impaired behavioral attitude: low school/work performance, impaired social interaction, and interpersonal relationship, in addition to an increased risk of musculoskeletal pain, headache, blurred vision, and hearing impairment [25].

Moreover, individuals with smartphone problematic use do experience symptoms of behavioral addiction as follows: preoccupation with and poor control of the behavior, tolerance, and withdrawal symptoms, and it may lead to different psychiatric problems such as depression, different types of anxiety, and social phobia [26].

The pervasiveness of smartphones in everyday life especially with young adults has recently raised concerns about increased problematic smartphone use among this category, so the present study aimed to detect the rate of occurrence and severity of smartphone addiction among a sample of female university students and some factors affecting this problematic use as the studying field type (whether practical or academic) also, to investigate the relation of smartphone addiction with the severity of social phobia.

Social phobia estimates

The percentage of students with social phobia in the current study is 71.35%, distributed as follows: 22.78% have mild social phobia, 21.85% had moderate social phobia, students with severe social phobia constituted 16.3%, and those with very severe social phobia constituted 10.93% of the sample; by reviewing the previously done researches on social phobia among university students, there was a wide range of prevalence rate from 7% up to 92.2%

Some studies go with these results, for example, a study of Al-Azhar University students in Egypt reported social phobia in 68% of the students [27], and a study revealed that rate of distribution of social phobia was 44% in students with a reverse correlation with age, and that the female gender was one of the predictors of social phobia [28].

This is comparable to a study done also among students of different faculties in Ain Shams University which reported anxiety in 58.99% of the sample. In another study in Saudi Arabia, it shows that social phobia constitutes 59.5% of the study sample of students [29].

Similarly, high prevalence of social phobia was found among students of Taibah University in Saudi Arabia with a percentage of 52% [30]. However, 92.2% of a sample recruited from university students in Saudi Arabia was found to have social phobia [31].

Meanwhile, a research recruited 364 participants from two universities in Indonesia and found that 76.9% of them have social anxiety [32]. The same was found in medical students in Khartoum with the majority having social anxiety disorder by percentage of 61.3% of which 19.2% have mild SAD, 21.6% have moderate SAD, 10.9% with severe SAD and 9.6% with very severe SAD [33].

Yet, a study done among 1019 Omani adults reported that 45.9% of the sample had social anxiety disorder [34], which differs from a study done among Saudi adolescent boys where 11.7% had social anxiety disorder [35].

Meanwhile, an Ethiopian study finds that 31.2% of undergraduate students had social phobia especially in females [36]. While studies held in western countries showed different results, a study on Swedish university students report having social phobia in 16.1% only [37]; another study on Australian first year university students reported that 18.3% has social phobia [38]. In a study done in undergraduate students in India, A total of 7.8% of students suffer of social anxiety disorder [39],the majority of them are females.

The current study shows association between social anxiety severity and living in dormitory; this is close to results of another study where students who live in dormitory have anxiety more than those living with their families which may be due to home sickness and change in their support network as they worry about the new environment [40].

This differs from results of a study done in Iran in which there were no significant relation between social anxiety and sociodemographic data [41]. These variations between different studies may be attributed to methodological and cultural differences.

Smartphone addiction in academic and practical studying field groups

The smartphone addiction is more severe in students of academic faculties than in students of practical faculties; this may be because students in practical faculties as Faculty of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering do not have time for excessive use of smartphones due to large number of time-consuming tasks, condensed courses, and continuous assessments; also, they may be engaged in practical training courses.

In a study done in Saudi Arabia, students from the theoretical faculties showed significantly higher levels of problematic smartphone use compared to students from faculty of medicine [42]. Another study done in India showed that the mean score of smartphone addiction in academic faculties (Arts and Commerce) is higher than the mean score in practical faculty like Faculty of Science [43].

Yet, in a study done in the Faculty of Medicine in Malaysia, the percentage of smartphone addiction among students of different years is 40% not only for communication but also for professional purposes as they use smartphone in their study for researches and updates in medical field.

This differs from results of study done among Ain Shams University students which did not show significant relation between smartphone addiction and type of faculty whether academic or practical [44]. This difference may be due to different criteria from sample in the current study regarding unequal number of both practical and academic faculties, inclusion of both genders, and larger number of the sample.

The relation between smartphone addiction and social phobia

This study shows significant relation between smartphone addiction and social phobia, students with higher scores in social phobia have higher smartphone addiction, and this can be due to feeling more comfortable in virtual communication than real communication as they fear of being embarrassed or judged regarding their physical appearance and of talking in a group of people.

Moreover, smartphone addiction in socially anxious people may result from excessive use of smartphone in nonsocial purposes to fill their time, obtain gratifications and distraction from stressors, and compensate for the lack of face-to-face interactions. These results are similar to what was reported in another study done in Turkey and showed increased problematic smartphone use in people with interaction anxiety [45].

The same was found in study where social support plays a role in smartphone addiction by affecting interaction anxiety; so, as social support decreases, interaction anxiety increases and leads to more smartphone addiction [46]. Also, studies regarding smartphone use for social interaction reported that socially anxious young adults have problematic smartphone use to communicate with others rather than real face-to-face communication [47].

The results in a recent study showed that there may be a transactional relation between smartphone addiction and social anxiety; so, social anxiety can result in worsening smartphone addiction and vice versa [48]. In young adults, social anxiety is sometimes associated with problematic Internet addiction which is mostly through using smartphones which may be due to poor social skills [49].

Among factors mediating relation between problematic smartphone addiction and social anxiety are sense of boredom and fear of missing out new feeds in different methods of social communication [50].

Another study done in undergraduate students recruited also from different academic and practical faculties showed similar relation in which as social anxiety increases, the problematic smartphone use increases [51].

This is consistent with a study that showed that socially anxious individuals are at higher risk to develop problematic smartphone use due to the easy accessibility to online social gratifying contents and online interactions [52].

Another study revealed that the significant relationship between social anxiety and smartphone problematic use is moderated through feeling confident to trust others in online interactions than real-life interactions; so, they spend more time and become attached to their smartphones, as online trust leads to self-disclosure during social interactions [53].

The current study agrees with another that reported frequent checking of smartphones by individuals with social anxiety seeking reassurance from online interaction-related notifications. In addition, those with social phobia may show problematic smartphone use not only for social interactions but also for entertainment, relaxation activities, and searching for information as they avoid asking others for fear of judgment and due to their low self-esteem [54].

Several studies reported that anxiety is one of the most common mental health problems that is correlated with smartphone addiction [42, 55]. Others referred this to negative impact of smartphone addiction on mental health leading to different problems like different types of anxiety [56, 57].

This differs from a study done in Beijing which did not find a significant relation between smartphone problematic use and social phobia, this may be due to lower number of the sample than the current study and also was explained due to increased use of smartphone in undergraduates than old adults nowadays as they accept the new technologies rapidly and smartphone became the usual way of communication regardless having social anxiety or not [58].


Social phobia and smartphone addiction are common in students who are in academic faculties than students in practical faculties. Smartphone addiction is more common and more severe in those with social phobia, and severity increases with more severe social phobia; so, public awareness is needed regarding hazards of smartphone addiction and regarding early intervention and management of psychiatric disorders.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.



Social anxiety disorder


Problematic smartphone use


World Health Organization


Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV diagnoses


  1. Mäki P (2015) Social phobia and depression in adolescence in the general population and 2 years follow up. Social phobia and depression in adolescence in general population concurrent associations. Acta Univ Tampere 2040:33

  2. Cheever N, Rosen L, Carrier M, Chavez A (2014) Out of sight is not out of mind: the impact of restricting wireless mobile device use on anxiety levels among low, moderate and high users. Comput Hum Behav 37:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Griffiths MD (2015) Problematic technology use during adolescence: why don’t teenagers seek treatment? Educ Health 33(1):6–9

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elhai Jon D, Levine Jason C, Hall BJ (2019) Problematic smartphone use and mental health problems: current state of research and future directions. Dusunen Adam J Psychiatry Neurol Sci 32:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee BW, Stapinski LA (2012) Seeking safety on the internet: relationship between social anxiety and problematic internet use. J Anxiety Disord 26(1):197–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Elhai JD, Contractor AA (2018) Examining latent classes of smartphone users: relations with psychopathology and problematic smartphone use. Comp Hum Behav 82:159–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ghosh P (2020) Smartphone addiction – a new disorder or just a hype. Clin Psychiatry 6(1):66

    Google Scholar 

  8. “Investigation of smartphone use while walking and its influences on one’s behavior among pedestrians in Taiwan,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction(Cham: Springer; ) 469–475.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Olsen EOM, Shults RA, Eaton DK (2013) Texting while driving and other risky motor vehicle behaviors among US high school stu- dents. Pediatrics 131(6):e1708–e1715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang SY, Chen MD, Huang YC, Lin CY, Chang JH (2017) Association between smartphone use and musculoskeletal discomfort in adolescent students. J Community Health 42(3):423–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee H, Ahn H, Choi S, Choi W (2014) The SAMS: smartphone addiction management system and verification. J Med Syst 38(1):1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim SE, Kim JW, Jee YS (2015) Relation between smartphone addiction and physical activity in Chinese international students in Korea. J Behav Addict 4(3):200–205

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahapatra S (2019) Smartphone addiction and associated consequences: role of loneliness and self-regulation. Behav Inform Technol 38(8):833–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leyfer O, Gallo KP, Cooper-Vince C, Pincus DB (2013) Patterns and predictors of comorbidity of DSM-IV anxiety disorders in a clinical sample of children and adolescents. J Anxiety Disord 27(3):306–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tauscher J, Kielbasa W, Iyengar S, Vandenhende F, Peng X, Mozley D et al (2010) Development of the 2nd generation neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist LY686017 for social anxiety disorder. EurNeuropsychopharmacol 20:80–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bernroider EWN, Wong CWY, Lai K (2014) From dynamic capabilities to ERP enabled business improvements: the mediating effect of the implemen- tation project. Int J Project Manag 32(2):350–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Demirci K, Akgonul M, Akpinar A (2015) Relationship of smartphone use severity with sleep quality, depression, and anxiety in university students. J Behav Addict 4(2):85–92

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. First M, Spitzer R, Williams J et al (1995) Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I) (user’s guide and interview) Research Version. Biometrics Research Network, New York Psychiatric Institute, New York

  19. El Missiry A, Sorour A, Sadek A, et al. (2004) Homicide and psychiatric illness. An Egyptian study: MD Thesis in Ain Shams University

  20. Kwon M, Lee JY, Won WY, Park JW, Min JA, Hahn C et al (2013) Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PLoS ONE 8(2):e56936

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sfendla A, Laita M, Nejjar B, Souirti Z, Ahami A, Senhaji M (2018). Reliability of the Arabic Smartphone Addiction Scale and Smartphone Addiction Scale-Short Version in Two Different Moroccan Samples. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 21:325–332.

  22. Connor KM, Davidson JRT, Churchill E, Sherwood A, Foa E, Weisler RW (2000) Psychometric properties of the Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). Br J Psychiatry 176:379–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Zaki N, Ramy H, Shaker N, Hussein H. (2007) Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN). Current psychiatry.

  24. Ragheb M, Ramy H, Hussein H et al (2007) Psychometricproperties of the Arabic version of social phobia inventory (SPIN). Current Psychiatry 14(1):36–44

    Google Scholar 

  25. Soni R, Upadhyay R, Jain M (2017) Prevalence of smartphone addiction, sleep quality and associated behavior problems in adolescents. Int J Res Med Sci 5:515–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alhassan AA, Alqadhib EM, Taha NW et al (2018) The relationship between addiction to smartphone usage and depression among adults: a cross sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 18:148

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ragheb K, Abd El-Azem S, Abdel-wahab M, Attia H, Ismail R, said M, Taha H, (2009) Egypt. J. Psychiatry 29(1):5–13

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rabie MA, Shorab E, El-Gabry DA, Aziz KA, Sabry WM, Aufa OM, El-Ghamry RH, Hassan G, Nagy N (2019) Screening of social phobia symptoms in a sample of Egyptian university students. Arch Clin Psychiatry 46(2):27–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Elhadad AA, Alzaala MA, Alghamdi RS et al (2017) Social phobia among Saudi medical students. Middle East Curr Psychiatry 24:68–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Hazmi BH, Sabur SS, Al-Hazmi RH (2020) Social anxiety disorder in medical students at Taibah University, Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care 9(8):4329–4332

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Alkhalifah A, Alsalameh NS, Alwries NA, Alhomaidhy MA (2017) 2017 Prevalence of social phobia among medical students in Saudi Arabia. Egypt J Hosp Med 69(2412):2416

    Google Scholar 

  32. Suryaningrum Cahyaning (2021) College student’s social anxiety: a study of the young people mental health in digital age. JurnalKonselingdanPendidikan 9:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  33. Suleiman HA, Elamin SA, Alobeid AA, Altaib WE (2021) Prevalence of social anxiety disorder among medical students from six medical schools in Khartoum state. Sudan J Med Sci (SJMS) 16(2):223–232

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ambusaidi A, Al-Huseini S, Alshaqsi H et al (2022) the prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of social anxiety disorder: a focused national survey. Chronic Stress 2:6

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ghazwani JY, Khalil SN, Ahmed RA (2016) Social anxiety disorder in Saudi adolescent boys: prevalence, subtypes, and parenting style as a risk factor. J Fam Comm Med 23(1):25–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Desalegn GT, Getinet W, Tadie G (2019) The prevalence and correlates of social phobia among undergraduate health science students in Gondar Gondar Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes 12:438

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Tillfors M, Furmark T (2007) Social phobia in Swedish university students: prevalence, subgroups and avoidant behavior. Soc Psychiatry PsychiatrEpidemiol 42(1):79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wilson I (2005) Screening for social anxiety disorder in first year university students – a pilot study. AustFam Physician 34(11):983–984

    Google Scholar 

  39. Honnekeri BS, Goel A, Umate M, Shah N, De Sousa A (2017) Social anxiety and Internet socialization in Indian undergraduate students: an exploratory study. Asian J Psychiatr 27:115–120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Daniel HT, Ibrayeva L, Sparks J, Lim N, Clementi A, Almukhambetova A, Nurtayev Y, Muratkyzy, A (2020) Mental Health and Well-Being of University Students: A Bibliometric Mapping of the Literature. Front Psychol. 11:1226.

  41. Talaei A, HashemiJavaheri Z, ZareMalekabad F, KhojastehRahimi F, Talaei A, Rezaeitalab F (2019) Investigating social phobia and its relationship with emotional intelligence in medical students. J Fundament Mental Health 21(5):275–282

    Google Scholar 

  42. El-SayedDesouky D, Abu-Zaid H (2020) Mobile phone use pattern and addiction in relation to depression and anxiety. East Mediterr Health J 26(6):692–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Patel SA, Puri PA (2017) A study of mobile phone addiction and mental health among adolescent girls studying in various streams. Int J Ind Psychol. 5(1):1

  44. Okasha T, Saad A, Ibrahim I, Elhabiby M, Khalil S, Morsy M (2022) Prevalence of smartphone addiction and its correlates in a sample of Egyptian university students. Int J Soc Psychiatry 68(8):1580–1588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Buyukbayraktar (2020) European Journal of Educational Sciences. 7(2):1857–6036

  46. Çelik O, Konan N (2019) The Mediator Role of Interaction Anxiety in the Relationship between Social Support Perception and Smartphone Addiction. J Educ Futur 63–75

  47. Turgeman L, Hefner I, Bazon M, Yehoshua O, Weinstein A (2020) Studies on the relationship between social anxiety and excessive smartphone use and on the effects of abstinence and sensation seeking on excessive smartphone use. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17;1262.

  48. Inokentii O, KorniienkoBeata V (2020) BarchiThe relationship between problematic use of smartphones and social anxiety. J Intellect Disabil Diagn Treat 8:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Weinstein A, Dorani D, Elhadfi R, Bukovza Y, Yarmulnik A, Dannon P (2015) Internet addiction is associated with social anxiety in young adults. Ann Clin Psychiatry 27(1):4–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wolniewicz CA, Rozgonjuk D, Elhai JD (2019) Boredom proneness and fear of missing out mediate relations between depression and anxiety with problematic smartphone use. Hum Behav Emerg Technol 2(1):61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Enez Darcin A, Kose S, Noyan C, Nurmedov S, Yilmaz O, Dilbaz N (2016) Smartphone addiction and its relationship with social anxiety and loneliness. Behav Inform Technol 35:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Brand M, Wegmann E, Stark R, Müller A, Wölfling K, Robbins TW, Potenza MN (2019) The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond Internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 104:1–10. (Epub 2019 Jun 24 PMID: 31247240)

  53. Annoni AM, Petrocchi S, Camerini AL, Marciano L (2021) The relationship between social anxiety, smartphone use, dispositional trust, and problematic smartphone use: a moderated mediation model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:2452

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Elhai JD, Gallinari E, Rozgonjuk D, Haibo Y (2020) Depression, anxiety and fear of missing out as correlates of social, non-social and problematic smartphone use. Addict Behav 105:106335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ratan ZA, Parrish A-M, Zaman SB, Alotaibi MS, Hosseinzadeh H (2021) Smartphone addiction and associated health outcomes in adult populations: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(22):12257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Contractor AA, Frankfurt SB, Weiss NH, Elhai JD (2017) Latent-level relations between DSM-5 PTSD symptom clusters and problematic smartphone use. Comput Human Behav 72:170–177. (Epub 2017 Feb 22. PMID: 28993716; PMCID: PMC5630169)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Rupert Maya, Hawi Nazir (2016) Relationships among smartphone addiction, stress, academic performance, and satisfaction with life. Comp Hum Behav 573:21–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Xu J (2017) Research on the relationship among phone addiction, social anxiety and loneliness in high school students. Open J Soc Sci 5:18–24

    Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



ZK recruited the participants and applied the used questionnaires and wrote the results after statistical analysis, GN reviewed the results, HH reviewed results and discussion, DS revised the background and aim, and DA revised the references. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zainab Khaled Mohamed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee of Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University (FWA: 00017585). Also, a written informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study. The consent also included publishing the results of the study with keeping the anonymity of participants.

Consent for publication

The participants gave consent for using their data in publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohamed, Z.K., ElNahas, G.M., Hatata, H.AM. et al. Smartphone addiction and its relation to social phobia in female university students. Middle East Curr Psychiatry 30, 74 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: