Skip to main content
Middle East Current Psychiatry
Download PDF

Psychiatric morbidity and quality of life in infertile females: a cross-sectional, case-controlled hospital-based study

Middle East Current Psychiatry volume 29, Article number: 89 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Infertility is a huge global problem with a significant mental health burden. Infertility could become a source of continuous stress leading to psychosocial issues including stress, anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem in these women. A cross-sectional, case-controlled study was conducted between January 2021 and November 2021 to study the effect of infertility on mental health and quality of life. A semi-structured questionnaire was used for sociodemographic and clinical variables. The Oslo Social Support Scale-3 and FertiQol were used to study social support and quality of life respectively. Psychiatric morbidity was assessed using ICD-10 symptom checklist. A total of 56 cases and 102 controls were studied.

Results

The mean age of cases and controls was 30.4 ± 3.5 years and 31.9 ± 2.9 years, respectively. Young infertile females, primary infertility, and female factor for infertility were associated with higher psychiatric morbidity. Psychiatric morbidity was seen in 46.4% of infertile women. FertiQoL score for the infertile group was 64.61 ± 5 with the lowest score in the emotional domain (45.10) and mind-body domain (54.86) (p < 0.0001). The scores in the relational domain and social domain were higher (85.2 and 73.3, respectively). The scores in the mind-body domain and emotional domain were poor among the infertile women regardless of the presence of psychiatric morbidity (48.27 vs 59.80 and 43.57 vs 46.57) (p < 0.0001–0.04).

Conclusions

Our study emphasizes the role of more qualitative instruments like FertiQoL in studying the well-being of infertile women. Even in the absence of psychiatric morbidity, the QoL score could still predict mental well-being in fertility-related issues.

Background

Procreation is an essential human desire, and hence, infertility causes a great deal of psychosocial distress [1]. Infertility can affect both men and women and is defined by WHO as the failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sexual intercourse [2, 3]. Infertility is further categorized into primary and secondary. Primary infertility is defined as the nonachievement of the first pregnancy. In contrast, secondary infertility is defined as the inability to achieve a subsequent pregnancy irrespective of the previous pregnancy outcome [4].

The prevalence of infertility has been increasing alarmingly with more than 48 million couples and 186 million individuals worldwide [5]. Sufficient evidence indicates that infertility is a major cause of stress among women and more so among women with primary infertility [6]. Infertility is a source of intense painful emotional experience leading to psychosocial issues including stress, anxiety, depression, and low self-esteem in these women [7, 8]. All these factors result in poor mental and social well-being of these women, and the same reflects in poor quality of life among these females [9].

In India, the overall prevalence of infertility lies in between 3.9 and 16.8% [10]. Most studies by Indian researchers have focused on the psychiatric diagnoses that occur during infertility treatment. The reported morbidity has been between 30 and 60% [11,12,13]. Mental health issues in conjunction with quality of life among infertile women have not been thoroughly addressed in Third-World countries. If at all, this distress has been measured in the form of quantitative variables like morbidity, but qualitative reflectors like the quality of life are less studied [10, 12, 14, 15].

We planned this study in Government Medical College, Anantnag, which has been functioning as the only tertiary care center in South Kashmir since 2019. It caters to a population of 2.67 million approximately spread over five districts and two regions of Jammu and Kashmir. This study aimed to assess the impact of infertility on mental health and quality of life in females.

Methods

A semi-structured questionnaire with standardized, validated scales was used to obtain the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, social support, the presence of psychiatric morbidity, and quality of life. Patients who fulfilled the definition of infertility and consented to participate were selected from the outpatient infertility clinic of a teaching hospital (Government Medical College, Anantnag) and labelled as cases. The operational definition of infertility was failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after 12 months of regular and unprotected sexual intercourse [2]. Patients with a history of previous psychiatric illness, mental retardation, history of chronic medical illness or surgical illnesses with a protracted course, receiving treatment for active medical illness, or receiving contraceptive medications were excluded. Fertile females with at least one living child in the reproductive age group (18–45 years) visiting the hospital for minor obstetric/gynecological ailments and sociodemographic characteristics similar to that of the cases were selected from the gynecological outpatient department of the same hospital and labelled as controls. Patients who had delivered in the past 6 weeks, underwent a major surgery, survived an obstetric/gynecological/surgical/medical complication in the recent past were excluded from the control group. The study was time-bound and conducted over 11 months (January 2021 to November 2021). The purpose of the study was explained, and informed consent was obtained from the respondents. Responses were obtained using a face-to-face interview after the questionnaire was explained in lay language. Responses were recorded by resident doctors who were well versed in questionnaire administration and interview techniques.

Sociodemographic and clinical information which included age, duration of infertility/marriage, educational level, occupation, domicile, socioeconomic status (modified Kuppuswamy scale), type of infertility, cause of infertility, and modality of treatment sought were recorded.

Social support was evaluated using the Oslo Social Support Scale-3. It is a brief and validated instrument to assess the level of social support and comprises a set of three questions. Responses were derived both from sum total and item-by-item rating [16].

The presence of psychiatric diagnosis was done using the ICD-10 symptom checklist for mental disorders, version 1.1. This symptom checklist is based on the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases, a medical classification list by the World Health Organization, and is a highly validated, widely accepted, and uniform instrument to assess the presence of psychiatric morbidity [17].

Quality of life was assessed using FertiQoL, an internationally validated and standardized instrument for women experiencing fertility problems. FertiQol is a more sensitive, reliable, and valid measure of quality of life in infertile women than general measures of quality of life such as WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36 [18]. It measures the effect of infertility problems in different areas such as self-esteem, emotions, general health, partnership, family and social relationships, work-life, and future life plans. The personal QoL dimension includes two domains, a six-item emotional domain and a six-item mind-body domain. The interpersonal QoL dimension includes a six-item relational domain and a six-item social domain. Only the four core domains of FertiQoL were studied. The maximum possible scaled score obtainable is 100 representing the highest QoL, and a value of 75 is taken as the benchmark normal value [19, 20].

The data was compiled in an Excel master sheet, and SPSS version 19 was used to analyze it. The chi-square test was used to evaluate the differences between dependent categorical variables in the population. The Student’s t-test was used when two independent groups were compared, and the t-test was extended to ANOVA when more than two groups were compared. A P-value of less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.

Complete privacy and confidentiality were ensured during the process of study. Ethical approval was taken from the Ethics Committee of Government Medical College Anantnag. All procedures followed during the study were the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 as revised in 2013.

Results

Sociodemographic variables

Of the 206 women sampled, 56 meeting the definition of infertility were taken as cases, and 102 fertile women with matched sociodemographic profile were included as controls. The mean age of cases was 30.4 ± 3.5 years, and that of controls was 31.9 ± 2.9 years. The majority of these women belonged to the age group 25–35 years. Majority of women were married for less than 8 years [n = 37 (cases); n = 78 (controls)]. More than half (65%; 33 cases and 70 controls) of the study population was either illiterate or educated up to the primary level. The majority of cases and controls were homemakers (75% and 78%, respectively). Most of the study population was rural [n = 37 (cases); n = 65 (controls)]. The distribution of both cases and controls was comparable across various socioeconomic classes (Table 1).

Table 1 Comparison between infertile group and fertile group as regard sociodemographic and clinical variables (denominators indicate the respective proportions)
Full size table

Twenty-two patients in the case group were seeking drug therapy, while 14 had underwent diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Thirty-seven infertile women sought help from faith healers. Only two infertile patients did not seek any remedy. The total figures are more than 56 as many of them had sought more than one type of treatment. The majority of cases (n = 47) as well as controls (n = 82) had good or strong social support.

Psychiatric morbidity

Psychiatric morbidity was seen in 46.4% of the infertile women (n = 26). The most prevalent morbidity was panic disorder (n = 8), followed by depression (n = 5) and somatization (n = 4). Only 15.6% (n = 16) of fertile women fulfilled the criteria for a psychiatric illness with an almost equal distribution among different diagnoses. One participant in each fertile and infertile group reported suicidality. Among the cases, higher psychiatric morbidity was present in the age group of 25–35 years (53.9%), and a similar pattern was seen in controls. Psychiatric morbidity was significantly higher in the cases across all age groups (p = 0.005–0.05). We also observed that psychiatric morbidity was significantly higher in the earlier years of marriage as compared to the later years (69.2% & 56.2% vs 30.7% & 43.8%; p < 0.0001).

Psychiatric morbidity was more prevalent both in cases and controls in illiterate or lower educational groups (primary and secondary school level). There was a statistically significant difference in the psychiatric morbidity between cases and controls in the illiterate group (p < 0.0001). Homemakers suffered psychiatric morbidity more often than working women both in the cases and controls (84.6% and 75%, respectively). Infertile homemakers demonstrated a significantly higher psychiatric morbidity when compared with fertile homemakers (p < 0.0001). Rural infertile population had a significantly higher psychiatric morbidity (80.7%; p < 0.0001).

Psychiatric morbidity was higher in the upper-lower, lower-middle, and upper-middle socioeconomic classes, both in case and control groups (80.7% and 93.7%, respectively). This difference in the psychiatric morbidity between cases and controls was statistically significant (p = 0.01–0.05). Women with secondary infertility demonstrated lower psychiatric morbidity as compared to women with primary infertility (92.3% vs 7.7%). Coexistent or independent male factor for infertility was associated with a lower mental health burden.

Social support and quality of life

Total and individual domain scores were significantly better in controls compared to cases (p 0.04–0.0001). The total score on FertiQOL for the infertile group was 64.61 ± 4.7 with the least score in the emotional domain (45.10) and mind-body domain (54.86) with p < 0.0001. The scores in the relational and social domains were significantly higher (85.2 and 73.3, respectively). Regardless of the presence of psychiatric morbidity, the scores in the mind-body domain and emotional domain were poor among the infertile group (48.27 vs 59.80 and 43.57 vs 46.57) with p < 0.0001. Similarly, the scores in the social and relational domains were better irrespective of the psychiatric diagnosis (73.10 vs 73.49 and 78.60 vs 88.63, respectively). These results were statistically significant (p < 0.0001–0.04) (Table 2).

Table 2 Relationship between FertiQoL scale and infertility
Full size table

Comparatively, women in the fertile group reported a higher total FertiQOL score of 82 ± 4.8. Among fertile women, the scores for different domains of FertiQOL were above the benchmark of 75 (p < 0.0001). The presence of psychiatric morbidity did not decrease the QoL scores below the benchmark of 75 in the fertile group. Women with good or strong social support were affected less commonly with psychiatric illness when compared with women who lacked social support (p = 0.001–0.006) (Table 2).

Discussion

Globally, infertility has been on a rise for a long time, affecting approximately 8–12% of couples [5, 21]. In addition to social stigmatization, marital disharmony, and economic consequences, infertility has been associated with a high prevalence of mental health issues. All these factors eventually are reflected as poor quality of life in the affected women [22,23,24].

Sociodemographic factors have been seen to affect the mental health of infertile women significantly [25]. Younger infertile women were found to seek medical help more often, and psychiatric morbidity affected a larger proportion of this group. As has been seen, women early in their married/infertile life tend to seek frequent consultations and try multiple treatment options which has strongly been associated with increased stress and subsequent development of mental health issues [26]. Older women presented to the infertility clinic less often, as they could have exhausted options in medical treatment, accepted childlessness as God’s wish, and sought other means of completing a family like adoption [27]. This positive effect of age indicates that with maturity, women develop resilience and are better equipped to tackle the infertility experience [28, 29].

The prevalence of primary and secondary infertility varies in different regions of the world with a reported higher prevalence of primary infertility in the developing world. Being part of the developing world, a higher representation of primary infertility cases was expected in our study population [30]. Similar trend has also been seen elsewhere in developing world [31].

Researchers have found that significantly more patients with primary infertility have psychopathology than patients with other forms of infertility and healthy controls [32]. We also observed a higher prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in women with primary infertility. As observed in the present study, the coexistent or independent male factor for infertility has been seen to help females share the burden of infertility equally with males and lesser morbidity development [33]. As in other areas of the developing region, a multipronged approach with a strong reliance on faith healers was expected [34]. Khayata et al. who investigated the treatment seeking in infertile couples also observed the multimodal approach of infertile women while help seeking [35].

Forty-six percent of the infertile women had psychiatric morbidity, which was comparable to other studies from India reporting morbidity of 30 to 60% [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Although we did not study the longitudinal development or causation of psychiatric morbidity among the study participants, the percentage is well above the baseline mental health issues in this region [36]. So presumably the presence of mental health issues could be due to the effects of infertility-related direct and indirect stress [33]. Since perceived support has been shown to mitigate the effect of psychological distress, and it is an important tool to deal with the stress related to infertility, fair/strong social support in most cases could explain the nondevelopment of mental health problems in half of the cases [37,38,39].

Furthermore, our study population had controls matched with respect to most of the sociodemographic variables, social support, and quality of life could be reliably evaluated to understand the effect of infertility on mental well-being. Quality of life in our patients was assessed by FertilityQoL, which is an instrument specific to assess the living condition in case of fertility-related issues [20, 40]. The overall QoL scores were significantly lower in the infertile group compared to the control group. Previous studies from India and other countries have shown similar results with significantly lower values of total FertiQoL scores in infertile women [14, 15, 41].

Among both cases and controls, the QoL scores seemed to be unaffected by the presence of psychiatric morbidity. Further infertility seemed to be an independent variable affecting QoL scores regardless of associated psychiatric morbidity. However, Sule observed that quality-of-life scores in couples with infertility were affected by the presence of psychiatric morbidity. The respective total QoL score in Sule’s and our study was 55.8 and 69.8 vs 52.5 and 66.5 with and without psychiatric morbidity. In either of these studies, the QoL scores in infertile women were well below benchmark (75) regardless of morbidity. Furthermore, Sule did not compare it with control group, which would have checked the effect of infertility [11].

Emotional and mind-body domains consistently and significantly scored lower even in the absence of psychiatric morbidity which suggests that infertility could be an independent variable that affects these domains of QoL. This finding was in agreement with many studies conducted worldwide including the original developmental study of FertiQoL by Boivin et al. [19, 42, 43] Desai et al. while studying the Indian population also observed that the emotional domain is the worst affected by infertility-related issues [14]. However, Singh et al. in Patna city observed a lower social domain score in infertile women from a predominant urban sample [44].

Our case group scored better in the social and relational domains as compared to the mind-body and emotional domains. This might be because infertile women usually receive more care and social support leading to a better sense of social well-being. As has been observed that good social support helps to mediate stress and maintain social and interpersonal areas of the human psyche [45], a significant role is also played by the intact societal and family fabric present in this part of the world [46]. Since social and relation domains are directly related to the presence of social support and good interpersonal relationships, these scores remained consistently in the normal range even if some of these females had mental health morbidity.

Conclusions

Our study emphasizes the role of more qualitative instruments like FertiQoL in studying the well-being of infertile women. Even in the absence of psychiatric morbidity, the QoL score could still predict mental well-being in fertility-related issues. Many of these females, although well-maintained in social and interpersonal relations, may suffer in emotional and psychological aspects of health. Infertile females score lower in QoL even without the development of obvious psychiatric morbidity. Rather than looking for psychiatric morbidity, focusing on overall well-being with instruments like FertiQoL could be a better reflection of mental well-being. It also reflects the unmet mental health needs of this section.

Shortcomings of the study

The sample size was modest which restricted the statistical power to conclude. The sample taken during a year could be confounded by the environmental and financial factors prevailing during that year. The cross-sectional design of our study did not enable us to understand whether the psychiatric morbidity truly was a result of the experience of infertility. The direct comparison of low QoL versus morbidity as a consequence of infertility was not studied. Further research is required, including a diverse sample and longitudinal design to establish the temporal association with greater certainty vis-a-vis change in QoL score.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the fact that it belongs to a hospital database, and its public availability could compromise the confidentiality of participants and other patients registered in the database. However, this data can be made available from the corresponding author on reasonably serious request.

Abbreviations

OPD:

Outpatient department

ICD-10:

International Classification of Diseases-10

SPSS:

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

WHOQOL-BREF:

World Health Organization Quality-of-Life-BREF

SF-36:

36-Item Short-Form Health Survey

References

  1. Khodakarami N, Hashemi S, Sedigh S, Hamidi M, Taheripanah R (2009) The experience of living with infertility: a phenomenological study. Fertil Infertil Q 10(4):287–289

    Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization (WHO) (2018) International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-11). WHO, Geneva https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases. Accessed 2022 june12

    Google Scholar 

  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Public Health Action Plan for the Detection, Prevention, and Management of Infertility. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; June 2014. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/infertility/pdf/drh_nap_final_508.pdf. Accessed 2022 sep 19.

  4. Chambers GM, Dyer S, Zegers-Hochschild F, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Banker M, Mansour R, Kupka MS, Adamson GD (2021) International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014. Hum Reprod 36(11):2921–2934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA et al (2007) international estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 22:1506–1512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Berardis D, Mazza M, Marini S, Del Nibletto L, Serroni N, Pino MC, Valchera A, Ortolani C, Ciarrocchi F, Martinotti G, Di Giannantonio M (2014) Psychopathology, emotional aspects and psychological counseling in infertility: a review. Clin Ter 165(3):163–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Swift A, Reis P, Swanson M (2021) Infertility-related stress and quality of life in women experiencing concurrent reproductive trauma. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 1-6

  8. Alaami M, Amanati SS, Hagani H, Ramazanzade F (2009) Factors influencing quality of life among infertility women. IJN. 21(56):27–35

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farrokh Eslamlou HR, Haji Shafiha M et al (2014) The effect of primary infertility on the quality of life of women of Oroumieh, Iran. Oroumieh Med J 25(598):604–607

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patel A, Sharma PS, Narayan P, Binu VS, Dinesh N, Pai PJ (2016) Prevalence and predictors of infertility-specific stress in women diagnosed with primary infertility: a clinic-based study. J Hum Reprod Sci 9(1):28

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Sule R, Gupte SG (2015) Study of psychiatric morbidity in infertile women. MVP. J Med Sci:30–33

  12. Sethi P, Sharma A, Goyal LD, Kaur G (2016) Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in females amongst infertile couples-a hospital based report. J Clin Diagn Res 10(7):VC04

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Verma P, Rastogi R, Sachdeva S, Gandhi R, Kapoor R, Sachdeva S (2015) Psychiatric morbidity in infertility patients in a tertiary care setup. J Clin Diagn Res 9(9):VC01

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Desai HJ, Gundabattula SR (2019) Quality of life in Indian women with fertility problems as assessed by the FertiQoL questionnaire: a single center cross sectional study. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 40:82–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Huppelschoten AG, van Dongen AJ, Philipse IC, Hamilton CJ, Verhaak CM, Nelen WL et al (2013) Predicting dropout in fertility care: a longitudinal study on patient-centredness. Hum Reprod 28:2177–2186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dalgard S The Oslo 3-items social support scale. childbearing age—a life course perspective. BMC Public Health 11(1):745

  17. Janca A, Drimmelen JV, Dittmann V, Isaac M, Ustun TB, World Health Organization (1994) ICD-10 symptom checklist for mental disorders. World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  18. Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA (2004) The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res 13(2):299–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Boivin J, Takefman J, Braverman A (2011) The fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool: development and general psychometric properties. Hum Reprod 26(8):2084–2091

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Yaghmaei F, Mohammadi S, Alavimajd H (2009) Developing “quality of life in infertile couples questionnaire” and measuring its psychometric properties. J Reprod Infertil 10(2):137–143

    Google Scholar 

  21. Infertility WH (1991) A tabulation of available data on prevalence of primary and secondary infertility. Programme on material and child health and family planning division of family health. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hammerli K, Hansjorg Z, Barth J (2009) The efficacy of psychological interventions for infertile patients: a meta-analysis examining mental health and pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod Update 15:279–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dyer SJ (2009) Psychological and social aspects of infertility in developing countries. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 107(Suppl):S25–S26

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cousineau TM, Domar AD (2007) Psychological impact of infertility. Best Pract Resh Clin Obstet Gynaecol 21:293–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Upkong D, Orji E (2006 Winter) Nijerya'daki Infertil Kadinlarda Ruh Sağliği [Mental health of infertile women in Nigeria]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 17(4):259–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Noorbala A, Ramezanzadeh F, Abedi-Nia N, Naghizadeh MM (2009) HaghollahiF Prevalence of psychiatric disorders and types of personality in fertile and infertile women. J Reprod Infertil 9:350–360

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lechner L, Bolman C, van Dalen A (2007) Definite involuntary childlessness: associations between coping, social support and psychological distress. Hum Reprod 22(1):288–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Herrmann D, Scherg H, Verres R, Von Hagens C, Strowitzki T, Wischmann T (2011) Resilience in infertile couples acts as a protective factor against infertility-specific distress and impaired quality of life. J Assist Reprod Genet 28(11):1111–1117

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wadadekar GS, Inamdar DB, Nimbargi VR (2021) Assessment of impact of infertility & its treatment on quality of life of infertile couples using fertility quality of life questionnaire. J Hum Reprod Sci 14(1):3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Borumandnia N, Alavi Majd H, Khadembashi N, Alaii H (2022) Worldwide trend analysis of primary and secondary infertility rates over past decades: a cross-sectional study. Int J Reprod Biomed 20(1):37–46

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Benksim A, Elkhoudri N, Addi RA, Baali A, Cherkaoui M (2018) Difference between primary and secondary infertility in Morocco: frequencies and associated factors. Int J Fertil Steril 12(2):142–146

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Khodarahimi S, Hosseinmirzaei S, Bruna MM (2014) The role of infertility in mental health, psychological distress and sexual dysfunction in a sample of Iranian women. Women Ther 37(1–2):178–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rooney KL, Domar AD (2022) The relationship between stress and infertility. Dialogues Clin Neurosci

  34. Sharma DB, Gupta V, Saxena K, Shah UM, Singh US (2020) Role of faith healers: a barrier or a support system to medical care-a cross sectional study. J Fam Med Primary Care 9(8):4298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Khayata GM, Rizk DE, Hasan MY, Ghazal-Aswad S, Asaad MA (2003) Factors influencing the quality of life of infertile women in United Arab Emirates. Int J Gynecol Obstet 80(2):183–188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Housen T, Lenglet A, Ariti C, Shah S, Shah H, Ara S, Viney K, Janes S, Pintaldi G (2017) Prevalence of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in the Kashmir Valley. BMJ Glob Health 2(4):e000419

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Gibson DM (2000) The effect of social coping resources and growth-fostering relationships on infertility stress in women. The University Of North Carolina At Greensboro

    Google Scholar 

  38. Qadir F, Khalid A, Medhin G (2015) Social support, marital adjustment, and psychological distress among women with primary infertility in Pakistan. Women Health 55(4):432–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Durgun Ozan Y, Duman M (2020) Relationships between the perceived social support and adjustment to infertility in women with unsuccessful infertility treatments, Turkey-2017. J Nurs Midwifery Sci 7:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dural O, Yasa C, Keyif B, Celiksoy H, Demiral I, Yuksel Ozgor B, Gungor Ugurlucan F, Bastu E (2016) Effect of infertility on quality of life of women: a validation study of the Turkish FertiQoL. Hum Fertil 19(3):186–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Huppelschoten AG, van Dongen AJ, Verhaak CM, Smeenk JM, Kremer JA, Nelen WL (2013) Differences in quality of life and emotional status between infertile women and their partners. Hum Reprod 28:2168–2176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Peterson BD, Newton CR, Rosen KH, Skaggs GE (2006) Gender differences in how men and women who are referred for IVF cope with infertility stress. Hum Reprod 21:2443–2449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Peterson BD, Newton CR, Feingold T (2007) Anxiety and sexual stress in men and women undergoing infertility treatment. Fertil Steril 88:911–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Singh K, Shashi K, Rajshee K, Sinha S, Bharti G (2020) Assessment of depression, anxiety and stress among Indian infertile couples in a tertiary health care centre in Bihar. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstetrics Gynecol 9(2):659–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Amir M, Horesh N, Lin-Stein T (1999) Infertility and adjustment in women: the effects of attachment style and social support. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 6(4):463–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kumar D (2007) Prevalence of female infertility and its socioeconomic factors in tribal communities of Central India. Rural Remote Health 7(2):1–5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Nil.

Funding

Nil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry, Government Medical College, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir, India

    Mansoor Ahmad Dar, Seema Batool Shah, Pinki Kumari & Junaid Ahmad Tailie

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir, India

    Syed Nawaz Ahmad

  3. Department of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Anantnag, Jammu and Kashmir, India

    Tajali Nazir Shora

Authors
  1. Mansoor Ahmad Dar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Seema Batool Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Syed Nawaz Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tajali Nazir Shora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pinki Kumari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Junaid Ahmad Tailie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M, S, and N conceived the idea. J, T, P, and N collected the data. M, S, T, and N analyzed the data. All the authors contributed in writing the manuscript and all of them reviewed the manuscript. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syed Nawaz Ahmad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for study was taken from the Ethics Committee of Government Medical College Anantnag. Written Informed consent to participate was taken from all participants and or their legal guardians. No human experiments were carried out during the study. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

NA

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dar, M.A., Shah, S.B., Ahmad, S.N. et al. Psychiatric morbidity and quality of life in infertile females: a cross-sectional, case-controlled hospital-based study. Middle East Curr Psychiatry 29, 89 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-022-00257-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-022-00257-2

Keywords