Skip to main content

The association between nomophobia and loneliness among the general population in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia



Nomophobia progresses through phases (initiation, affirmation, need, and dependency), similarly to addiction, and manifests in a variety of ways, including socially, physiologically, and physically. The objective of the study is to examine the association between nomophobia and feelings of loneliness among a sample of the general population from the KSA. Data were gathered between 5 March and 5 April 2022 using a descriptive, cross-sectional survey design. Five hundred twenty-six participants make up the sample for this study. The information is gathered using a sociodemographic data sheet, Internet usage profiles, a nomophobia questionnaire, and the Loneliness Scale.


The majority of people in the study sample use the Internet for between 4 and 9 h, most immediately in the morning, on waking, for gaming, and for social communication. For nomophobia levels among the study population, the highest percentage is for a moderate level of nomophobia, with the highest means being for factor 1 (unable to communicate), followed by factor 4 (giving up convenience). They also have a moderate level of loneliness.


The multivariate analysis shows that the total loneliness score is strongly and positively correlated with the total nomophobia score and its four factors and the duration of daily mobile Internet use. There are also negative correlations with age and education level. Additionally, the overall nomophobia score has an inverse relationship with income level and age, but a high relationship with the frequency of daily mobile Internet use. The study suggests that there is a need for psychoeducation for a variety of sociodemographic groups to raise awareness about the psychological repercussions of nomophobia, practices that will help to reduce the time spent online for arbitrary reasons, to discover new and entertaining ways of communicating with each other.


The advent of new information and communication technologies (ICTs) in the digital era has offered a means for rapid communication, effective data retrieval, and access to the Internet, the world’s largest global communication network [1]. This era is characterized by the extensive and pervasive use of smartphones and mobile devices [2], which are mostly used due to their smaller dimensions that promote portability [3], to access the internet, contact friends and family, and quest for anything [4]. A preoccupation with up-to-date mobile apps can definitely generate an environment in which people spend more time with technology than with their peers [5]. Regardless, portable phones have become an integral tool of our everyday lives [6]. The use of smartphones has resulted in major issues and societal ramifications. Due to the effect that mobile technology has had on society and the dependence that its use has created among residents, nomophobia (non-mobile dread) is a contemporary illness [7, 8]. The incapability to contact or be telephoned by others, as well as the loss of quick access to information and one's network of contacts, all contribute to the emergence of this phobia and make it worse [9, 10]. Nomophobia is characterized by sensations of discomfort, worry, nervousness, or anguish that occur when a mobile phone is not in use and can even lead to suicide ideation and attempts [11].

Nomophobia is currently associated with the scare of not being able to communicate, one's connection being lost, suffering loneliness, and losing one’s comfort [12]. In other circumstances, nomophobia is strongly, positively, and significantly associated with difficulty using the Internet, worry over one’s social media profile, and reliance on using social media [13]. In other studies, it has been discovered that people with nomophobia exhibit incorrect stress-coping techniques [14], and those with high degrees of nomophobia are more likely to seek memory, self, and proximity [15]. Three symptomatic elements have been linked to this condition in past studies: anxiety, the obsessive use of smartphones, and panic sensations [16]. Furthermore, nomophobia has been proven to cause stress as a result of social threats, particularly when there is uncertainty or a deficit of control [17].

The concept of nomophobia is linked to problematic Internet use [13, 18], as well as the rise in time consumed online, and refers to the unreasonable fear that develops when someone is separated from their mobile telephone [9, 10].

Therefore, similarly to addictions, nomophobia progresses through phases (initiation, affirmation, need, and dependency) and manifests in a variety of ways, including socially, physiologically, and physically [7]. This significant dependency, which causes anxiety, worry, and/or panic when one’s smartphone is unavailable [8], is caused by four primary elements [10, 12]: (I) fear or apprehension about losing the ability to speak with others; (II) Fear of disconnecting; (III) fear of losing prompt access to information; and (IV) fear of giving up the comfort offered by mobile devices. Therefore, the loss of information and one’s network of acquaintances, as well as the inability to contact or be contacted by others, creates a phobia that interferes with the person’s advance in everyday life [10].

Loneliness is defined as an unwelcome and disagreeable experience that is frequently accompanied by worry, anger, despair, and other negative emotions. Although it is more common among teenagers and young adults, it can affect anyone at any age. Individuals who are lonely tend to isolate themselves from time-bound personal and public duties, associations, and social interactions [19]. Loneliness is the psychological result of failing to meet social and emotional expectations in human interactions [20].

The nature of human contact in the age of contemporary technology has led to decreased social relationships among members of society and the individual’s deprivation of many aspects necessary to form a normal personality. Therefore, technological growth and progress are seen as sources of psycho-loneliness and occasional insecurity. Furthermore, this has resulted in the proliferation of complicated forms of social communication with others, such as through the media and the Internet. As a result, the individual acquires values that may conflict with those of their family, as well as losing the values and traits that make them unique [21].

Originally, mobile phones were intended to be used for communication. Thus, it seems sensible that loneliness would be linked to the use of mobile phones. Loneliness is a strong predictor of mobile phone use choices [22]. For example, Yıldız Durak [23] discovered a strong link between loneliness and nomophobia, with loneliness predicting nomophobia. People also try to compensate for loneliness and social anxiety by using their phones [24].

Significance of the study

According to previous studies, individuals who are lonely may be vulnerable to the excessive use of Internet technology, and if they are unable to use a mobile phone, they are more likely to experience embarrassment [25]. Moreover, through the intermediating impact of the escape motive, loneliness may lead to the disproportionate use of mobile phones [26]. Regardless, this is a relatively novel problem characteristic of the digital age that is being exacerbated by the increasing use of mobile technology in people’s daily lives. Therefore, it is thought to be required to examine if nomophobia and loneliness are associated in a sample of Saudi Arabia's general population.

Aim of the study

This study intends to investigate the relationship between nomophobia and feelings of loneliness in a sample of Saudi Arabia’s general population. The research hypothesis states that nomophobia and feelings of loneliness scores are significantly and positively inter-correlated.

Subjects and methods

Research design and setting

These associations were examined in the study using a descriptive, cross-sectional study design. Additionally, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia was selected due to the convenience, accessibility, and availability of the researcher in Saudi Arabia.

Sample size

The target population in Saudi Arabia (about 13,300,000) and the prevalence of severe nomophobia (21.9%) [27], were used to determine the sample size. Using a confidence level of 95%, test power of 80%, and design effect 2. Thus, the sample size was determined to be 526 subjects using the Open-Epi version 3.0 software package [28]. Those that are enthusiastic to join in the research and those who are older than 18 years old are the inclusion criteria. Individuals under the age of 18 are excluded.

Data collection tools

A self-administered questionnaire form was used to gather the data. This questionnaire included two valid standardized tools, in addition to a section inquiring about respondents’ demographic information and their profiles on Internet use, including inquiries on their age, gender, marital status, level of education, income, and whether they feel good about relationships with others, the duration of their daily mobile Internet use, the time at which they use the Internet most, and their purpose for using the Internet.

The first tool

The nomophobia survey (NMP-Q) was developed by Yildirim and Correia [10], and without any modifications, the Arabic version was used to carry out the current investigation [29]. It contains 20 items rated on a Likert scale from 1 to 7, with 1 indicating robustly disagree and 7 indicating strongly agree (or totally agree). The four dimensions identified in this questionnaire are separated into questions inquiring about the inability to obtain information (items 1–4): dissatisfaction caused by the inability to look for information on the Internet using a smartphone or access information at any time; giving up convenience (items 5–9): the convenience and comfort that smartphones bring, particularly in terms of battery, coverage, and credits; the inability to communicate (items 10–15): feelings about failing to communicate immediately and being unable to use instant communication services; the inability to communicate (items 10–15): feelings about being unable to use instant communication services; feelings about losing connectedness (items 16–20): the emotions associated with a loss of ubiquitous connectivity. A higher score denotes a more severe case of nomophobia, and the total score ranges from 20 to 140. Specifically, a score of 20 or lower indicates no nomophobia; a score of at least 20 but not more than 60 is considered mild; a nomophobia score of at least 60 but not more than 100 indicates a moderate level; An extreme level is indicated by a score of greater than or equal to 100. Further, the ideal Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.88 was discovered in previous research [30]. The tool, therefore, had strong internal consistency in the current investigation, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.949.

The second tool

In this study, the brief form of the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-6) was used. It is one of the most extensively used scales for assessing social isolation and loneliness [31]. The original scale has 20 statements; however, the ULS-6 only has 6 [32]. Responses are given on a four-point Likert scale, with 1 meaning never and 4 meaning often. A higher score indicates greater loneliness. As per the suggestion of a previous study, the Arabic form of the ULS-6 was used for this study without any amendment [33]. In their study, Cronbach’s standardized alpha was 0.76, signifying that the translated scale was reliable [33]. In the current study, the alpha coefficient was 0.703.

Pilot study

Beforehand the main investigation, a pilot study was conducted on 10% of the calculated study sample to determine the lucidity of the scales, the practicality of the study, and the applicability of the data collection tools. It was also used to assess the scales’ reliability. According to the results of this pilot study, the typical time essential to answer the tools ranged from 10 to 15 min, based on the respondent’s level of knowledge and cooperation. The questionnaire was finalized using the findings of the pilot study, and the participants were excluded from the main study population.

Study procedure

The researcher uses social networks to electronically invite potential respondents to participate in the pilot and main investigations. An electronic questionnaire was used to collect data, which took about 10–15 min to complete. The online survey was created using Google Forms and was sent to participants through various social media sites (WhatsApp, Messenger, Facebook, and Imo). All applicable national data protection standards were followed during the data handling operations. There was no deceit in this study, and contributors received a debriefing at the end of the questionnaire. Additionally, only non-personally identifiable information was collected for the study. Finally, the data were collected over one month (5th March to 5th April 2022).

Ethical considerations

Participants were not pressured into participating in this study, and they did not receive any type of financial remuneration for participating. Before answering the questionnaire, participants were required to read and sign an informed consent form. Subjects were also told about the type of study being conducted, as well as its objective, before participating. In addition, subjects were given the researcher’s contact information and affiliations, and they were knowledgeable of their right to decline to participate in or discontinue it at whatever time. By using questionnaire identification numbers, potential breaches of confidentiality were mitigated; nonetheless, no identifying information, such as names, email addresses, or cell phone numbers, was collected from the participants, and their responses were fully nameless. No injury or risk, other than discomfort or inconvenience, to the subjects, was anticipated.

Statistical analysis

All data were gathered, processed, and statistically examined utilizing 2015’s IBM Corp. (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 23.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). The mean, standard deviation, and range were used to communicate quantitative data, whereas a percentage was used to represent qualitative data. To evaluate the correlation between the different study variables, Spearman's correlation coefficient was determined. In this case, a + sign denoted a positive correlation, but a (-) sign denoted a negative correlation. A strong association was also suggested by values close to 1, while a weak correlation was shown by values close to 0. As multiple linear regression is used to describe data and explain the link between one dependent continuous variable and one or more independent variables, it was employed as predictive analysis. All tests were two-sided and were deemed to be negligible statistically. Last but not least, a p value of 0.05 or higher was regarded as statistically significant, whereas a p value of 0.05 or below was regarded as statistically insignificant.


Table 1 demonstrates that approximately one-third of the study sample was aged 40 years and older (33.5%), while 30.6% of them were younger than 20 years old. Moreover, the highest percentages in the studied population were for the female gender, the single marital status, a university-level education, an average level of income, and feeling good about their relationship with others (60.1%, 52.7%, 46.8%, 91.3%, and 87.5%, respectively). Regarding the pattern of mobile Internet use, the results show that the majority of the study sample use the Internet for between four and nine hours (60.3%), usually immediately in the morning upon waking up (65.4%), and for gaming (67.5%) and social communication (66.9%).

Table 1 Demographic characteristics and profiles on Internet use of study sample (n = 526)

Table 2 demonstrates that the highest means of nomophobia factors were for being unable to communicate (20.5 ± 9.2), followed by giving up convenience (17.7 ± 7.9).

Table 2 Frequency distribution of nomophobia factors (n = 526)

According to Fig. 1, the level of nomophobia that had the highest percentage in the study sample was the moderate level (46.2%).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Percentage distribution of feelings of nomophobia levels in the studied population. Mild: 20 to < 60, moderate: 60 < 100, severe: 100 and beyond

According to Fig. 2, the level of feelings of loneliness with the highest percentage among the participants was the moderate level of loneliness, at 36%.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Percentage distribution of the feelings of loneliness levels in the studied population (n = 526)

The multivariate analysis (Table 3) shows that the total loneliness score was strongly and positively correlated with the total nomophobia score and its four factors and the duration of daily mobile Internet use, with a p value of 0.01, but it was negatively correlated with age and education level. On the other hand, the total nomophobia score was inversely correlated with income level and age but was strongly correlated with the duration of daily mobile Internet use.

Table 3 Correlation matrix of the loneliness score, the nomophobia score and its factors, age in years, education level, income level, and duration of daily mobile Internet use

According to Table 4, the nomophobia score, education level, and daily time spent on mobile Internet were significant predictors of loneliness scores among the studied population.

Table 4 Multiple linear regression model for the loneliness scores of the studied population (n =526)


Nomophobia is a modern phobia that arose in the digital age [17, 34] and is growing in prevalence as the smartphone becomes more integrated into society [35]. Many studies investigating nomophobia have reported that it promotes the development of mental diseases and personality disorders [36], as well as self-esteem issues, loneliness, and happiness issues [37]. Therefore, a sample of the Saudi Arabian general population was used in this study to investigate the association between nomophobia and feelings of loneliness.

The findings of the current research demonstrate that the highest percentages for the demographic characteristics of the study sample were for the female gender, the single marital status, and the university education level. A statistically significant inverse correlation was observed between the nomophobia score and age, and income levels scores. This indicates that younger individuals and those with insufficient income exhibit higher levels of nomophobia.

The findings of this study are consistent with those of preceding studies done in India, England, and Spain, which showed that various population groups, particularly young people, can be affected by nomophobia, whether they are university students [38, 39] or are at another education level [40]. Other evidence has also indicated that nomophobia is common in a variety of populations, particularly among young people and teenagers [7]. Furthermore, this issue has been viewed as a risk among all teenagers, not just university and high-school students [41].

However, these results were inconsistent with those of Moreno-Guerrero and colleagues [18], they conveyed, in their study in Spain, that because levels of nomophobia are comparable across all age groups, age has no bearing. As a result, there are no notable differences [18].

Furthermore, the verdicts of the current study were at odds with those of an earlier Australian study that found no significant relationship between income and education and levels of nomophobia [42].

Regarding the pattern of mobile Internet use, the results indicate that the majority of the study sample use the Internet for between 4 and 9 h, immediately in the morning after waking up, and for gaming and social communication, which indicates that the participants use the Internet for longer periods than intended. These findings agree with those of Hussien [43]. In their study conducted in Saudi Arabia, it was reported that the majority of participants spend four to nine hours each day on the Internet, primarily at night, and primarily for social purposes. In this regard, the outcomes of this study are parallel to those of earlier studies conducted in Saudi Arabia and Egypt, with the majority of participants saying that they frequently spend more time online than they anticipate [44]. Similarly, another study conducted in China delineated that the quantity of time spent online has progressively increased recently. Therefore, despite its numerous benefits, Internet use can be dangerous if not adequately governed [45].

As reported in the present study, the participants had varying degrees of nomophobia, with the highest percentage of them having a moderate level of nomophobia. Further, the highest means of nomophobia factors were found for factor 1 (unable to communicate), followed by factor 4 (giving up convenience). From this, it can be understood that the study participants’ main issues are the inability to communicate immediately or frequently and the fear of their smartphone’s battery dying. These results correlate with those found in the study conducted in Arab regions of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait that disclosed the prevalence of a moderate level of nomophobia among their studied populations [29, 46]. Similarly, another study reported that the highest nomophobia scores were for the nervousness or anxiety induced by being unable to communicate [47]. In addition, a study in Spain investigated nomophobia and reported that the highest scores were for factor 1 (being unable to communicate) among their sample [48]. Likewise, notably, the studied sample’s greatest worry was for their smartphone’s battery dying, as mentioned in a study conducted in Turkey [41].

The results indicate that in terms of loneliness levels, the highest percentage among the participants was for a moderate level of loneliness, with the nomophobia score and the daily time spent on mobile Internet being significant positive predictors of loneliness scores. This may be interpreted as lonely people favor to use the Internet for social connection, and they are more inclined to utilize the Internet to replace time spent on offline social activities. These results agree with those of a previous study indicating that people who are addicted to the Internet may experience loneliness and social isolation as a result of their excessive use of the Internet, which can lead to depression [49]. Similarly, another study found that the more time one spends online, the more likely one is to experience loneliness [50].

Additionally, there was a strong link found between smartphone intemperance, nomophobia, and Internet addiction according to a Malaysian study [51]. That is, individuals are motivated to spend more time on the Internet due to their fear of losing connection to the online world to the point where they become addicted to the Internet. Since many smartphone operations are accomplished via the Internet, and with smartphones being utilized more often, higher levels of Internet addiction can be expected. Furthermore, psychosocial issues such as anxiety, despair, and loneliness contribute to high levels of Internet addiction.

The multivariate analysis shows that the total loneliness score was strongly and positively correlated with the total nomophobia score and its four factors. This could indicate that those who be unable to find access to their smartphones experience loneliness as a result of their worry about being unable to socialize and communicate with others. This result correlates with that of a study conducted in Turkey that reported a substantial positive association between nomophobia and loneliness [52]. In another study on the Turkish general population, Kayis et al. [53], discovered a low but significant link between loneliness and smartphone addiction. Finally, the research hypothesis stated that nomophobia and feelings of loneliness scores are significantly and positively inter-correlated, which was accepted.

The current study's findings revealed a statistically significant negative correlation between loneliness and education, which is regarded as an independent predictor of loneliness and indicates that feeling lonely was associated with having a low level of education. However, this finding contradicted findings from earlier studies conducted in Kuwait and Poland [33, 54], which found that education had no statistically significant impact on loneliness


This research concluded that the majority of the examined population has a moderate level of nomophobia, especially due to being unable to communicate and giving up convenience, in addition to a moderate level of loneliness. Further, the multivariate analysis shows that the total loneliness score was strongly and positively correlated with the total nomophobia score and its four factors, as well as with the duration of daily mobile Internet use. However, there were negative correlations with age and education level. On the other hand, the total nomophobia score was inversely correlated with income level and age, while it was strongly correlated with the duration of daily mobile Internet use. Lastly, the nomophobia score, education level, and interval of everyday mobile Internet usage were significant predictors of loneliness scores among the studied population. The study suggests that there is a need for more research to raise awareness about the psychological ramifications of nomophobia through psychoeducation. Counseling sessions that could teach parents about practices that will help them reduce the time that their children and teenagers spend online for arbitrary reasons, aside from time spent on the Internet for homework and exams, and that could guide them toward new and entertaining ways of communicating with each other could also be helpful.


The primary restrictions and threats to study generalization were randomizations and cross-sectional design; hence, similar future studies should be carried out utilizing longitudinal research methods, with the inclusion of a random sample and employing a larger sample size. Cluster sampling could be utilized to recognize a district/state-wise viewpoint.

Availability of data and materials

All data are accessible via the Internet, as stated in the “References” section.



Kingdom of Saudi Arabia


Statistical Package for Social Sciences


  1. Rouleau G, Gagnon MP, Côté J (2015) Impacts of information and communication technologies on nursing care: an overview of systematic reviews (protocol). Syst Rev 4:75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bragazzi NL, Dini G, Toletone A, Brigo F, Durando P (2016) Leveraging big data for exploring occupational disease-related interest at the level of scientific community, media coverage and novel data streams: the example of silicosis as a pilot study. PLOS One 11(11):e0166051.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Barnes SJ, Pressey AD, Scornavacca E (2019) Mobile ubiquity: Understanding the relationship between cognitive absorption, smartphone addiction and social network services. Comput Hum Behav 90:246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park CS (2019) Examination of smartphone dependence: Functionally and existentially dependent behavior on the smartphone. Comput Hum Behav 93:123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts JA, Yaya LH, Manolis C (2014) The invisible addiction: Cell-phone activities and addiction among male and female college students. J Behav Addictions 3(4):254–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilmer HH, Sherman LE, Chein JM (2017) Smartphones and cognition: A review of research exploring the links between mobile technology habits and cognitive functioning. Front Psychol 8:605.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Anshari M, Alas Y, Sulaiman E (2019) Smartphone addictions and nomophobia among youth. Vulnerable Children Youth Stud 14(3):242–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kneidinger-Müller B (2019) When the smartphone goes offline: a factorial survey of smartphone users’ experiences of mobile unavailability. Comput Hum Behav 98:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rodríguez-García AM, Moreno-Guerrero AJ, López Belmonte J (2020) Nomophobia: An individual's growing fear of being without a smartphone—a systematic literature review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(2):580.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Yildirim C, Correia AP (2015) Exploring the dimensions of nomophobia: Development and validation of a self-reported questionnaire. Comput Hum Behav 49:130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang PW, Liu TL, Ko CH, Lin HC, Huang MF, Yeh YC, Yen CF (2014) Association between problematic cellular phone use and suicide: The moderating effect of family function and depression. Comp Psychiatr 55(2):342–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ali A, Muda M, Ridzuan AR, Nuji MNN, Izzamuddin MHM, Latiff DIA (2017) The relationship between phone usage factors and nomophobia. Adv Sci Letters 23(8):7610–7613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ayar D, Özalp Gerçeker G, Özdemir EZ, Bektaş M (2018) The effect of problematic internet use, social appearance anxiety, and social media use on nursing students' nomophobia levels. Computers, Informatics, Nursing (CIN) 36(12):589–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bragazzi NL, Re TS, Zerbetto R (2019) The relationship between nomophobia and maladaptive coping styles in a sample of Italian young adults: Insights and implications from a cross-sectional study. JMIR Mental Health 6(4):e13154.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Han S, Kim KJ, Kim JH (2017) Understanding nomophobia: structural equation modeling and semantic network analysis of smartphone separation anxiety. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Network 20(7):419–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Musa R, Saidon J, Rahman SA (2017) Who’s at risk for smartphone nomophobia and pathology: the young or matured urban millennials? Adv Sci Letters 23(8):7486–7489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olivencia-Carrión MA, Ferri-García R, Rueda M, Jiménez-Torres MG, López-Torrecillas F (2018) Temperament and characteristics related to nomophobia. Psychiatr Res 266:5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moreno-Guerrero AJ, Gómez-García G, López-Belmonte J, Rodríguez-Jiménez C (2020) Internet addiction in the Web of Science Database: a review of the literature with scientific mapping. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(8):2753.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ümmet D, Ekşi F (2016) Internet addiction in young adults in Turkey: Loneliness and virtual-environment loneliness. ADDICTA—The Turkish Journal on Addictions 3(1):10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Russell DW, Cutrona CE, McRae C, Gomez M (2012) Is loneliness the same as being alone? J Psychol 146(1–2):7–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Aldalalah O (2018) The level of cyber-bullying (bully, victim) through smartphone applications among students of the faculties of education in Jordanian universities and its relation to loneliness. Int J Soc Sci Educ Stud 5(1):145–163

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lee S, Tam CL, Chie QT (2014) Mobile phone usage preferences: The contributing factors of personality, social anxiety and loneliness. Soc Indicators Res 118(3):1205–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yıldız Durak H (2018) What would you do without your smartphone? Adolescents’ social media usage, locus of control, and loneliness as a predictor of nomophobia. ADDICTA—The Turkish Journal on Addictions 5(3).

  24. Kim JH (2018) Psychological issues and problematic use of smartphone: ADHD’s moderating role in the associations among loneliness, need for social assurance, need for immediate connection, and problematic use of smartphone. Comput Hum Behav 80:390–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Enez Darcin A, Kose S, Noyan CO, Nurmedov S, Yılmaz O, Dilbaz N (2016) Smartphone addiction and its relationship with social anxiety and loneliness. Behav Information Technol 35(7):520–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shen X, Wang JL (2019) Loneliness and excessive smartphone use among Chinese college students: moderated mediation effect of perceived stressed and motivation. Comput Hum Behav 95:31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cain J, Malcom DR (2019) An assessment of pharmacy students' psychological attachment to smartphones at two colleges of pharmacy. Am J Pharmaceutical Educ 83(7):7136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Epi Info is statistical software for epidemiology that the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, Georgia (US), developed. This study used version 6.02 (January 2001).

  29. Al-Balhan EM, Khabbache H, Watfa A, Re TS, Zerbetto R, Bragazzi NL (2018) Psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the nomophobia questionnaire: confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis—Implications from a pilot study in Kuwait among university students. Psychol Res Behav Manag 11:471–482.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Louragli I, Ahami A, Khadmaoui A, Mammad K, Lamrani AC (2018) Evaluation of the nomophobia’s prevalence and its impact on school performance among adolescents in Morocco. Problems Psychol 21st Century 12(2):84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Russell D, Peplau LA, Ferguson ML (1978) Developing a measure of loneliness. J Personality Assessment 42(3):290–294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Neto F (1992) Loneliness among Portuguese adolescents. Soc Behav Personal 20(1):15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Alheneidi H, AlSumait L, AlSumait D, Smith AP (2021) Loneliness and problematic Internet use during COVID-19 lock-down. Behav Sci (Basel, Switzerland) 11(1):5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Adawi M, Bragazzi NL, Argumosa-Villar L, Boada-Grau J, Vigil-Colet A, Yildirim C, Del Puente G, Watad A (2018) Translation and validation of the Nomophobia Questionnaire in the Italian language: Exploratory factor analysis. JMIR mHealth uHealth 6(1):e24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Sandeep TK (2018) A study on the effects of ICT-enabled gadgets and screen addiction among mechanical engineering students. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol 9:1223–1227

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lee S, Kim M, Mendoza JS, McDonough IM (2018) Addicted to cellphones: Exploring the psychometric properties between the Nomophobia Questionnaire and obsessiveness in college students. Heliyon 4(11):e00895.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ozdemir B, Cakir O, Hussain I (2018) Prevalence of nomophobia among university students: A comparative study of Pakistani and Turkish undergraduate students. Eurasia J Mathematics, Sci Technol Educ 14(4):1519–1532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bartwal J, Nath B (2020) Evaluation of nomophobia among medical students using smartphone in north India. Med J Armed Forces India 76(4):451–455.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Farooqui IA, Pore P, Gothankar J (2017) Nomophobia: an emerging issue in medical institutions? J Mental Health (Abingdon, England) 27(5):438–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rosales-Huamani JA, Guzman-Lopez RR, Aroni-Vilca EE, Matos-Avalos CR, Castillo-Sequera JL (2019) Determining symptomatic factors of nomophobia in Peruvian students from the National University of Engineering. Appl Sci 9(9):1814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yildirim C, Sumuer E, Adnan M, Yildirim S (2016) A growing fear: prevalence of nomophobia among Turkish college students. Information Dev 32(5):1322–1331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kaviani F, Robards B, Young KL, Koppel S (2020) Nomophobia: is the fear of being without a smartphone associated with problematic use? Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(17):6024.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Hussien, RM. Association between internet addiction and mental well-being among adolescents in the Al-Qassim region of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

  44. Taha MH, Shehzad K, Alamro AS, Wadi M (2019) Internet use and addiction among medical students in Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. Sultan Qaboos University Med J 19(2):e142–e147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Jorgenson AG, Hsiao RC, Yen CF (2016) Internet addiction and other behavioral addictions. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin North Am 25(3):509–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Bano N, Khan MA, Asif U, Beer J, Rawass H (2021) Effects of nomophobia on anxiety, stress and depression among Saudi medical students in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. JPMA. J Pakistan Med Assoc 71(3):854–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Moreno-Guerrero AJ, López-Belmonte J, Romero-Rodríguez JM, Rodríguez-García AM (2020) Nomophobia: Impact of cell phone use and time to rest among teacher students. Heliyon 6(5):e04084.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Aguilera-Manrique G, Márquez-Hernández VV, Alcaraz-Córdoba T, Granados-Gámez G, Gutiérrez-Puertas V, Gutiérrez-Puertas L (2018) The relationship between nomophobia and the distraction associated with smartphone use among nursing students in their clinical practicum. PLOS One 13(8):e0202953.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Senormancı O, Saraçlı O, Atasoy N, Senormancı G, Koktürk F, Atik L (2014) Relationship of Internet addiction with cognitive style, personality, and depression in university students. Comp Psychiatr 55(6):1385–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Nowland R, Necka EA, Cacioppo JT (2018) Loneliness and social Internet use: Pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspect Psychol Sci 13(1):70–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yin KT, Yahaya AH, Sangryeol C, Maakip I, Voo P, Maalip H (2019) Smartphone usage, smartphone addiction, internet addiction and nomophobia in University Malaysia Sabah (UMS). Southeast Asia Psychol J 7:2–13

    Google Scholar 

  52. Gezgin DM, Hamutoglu NB, Sezen-Gultekin G, Ayas T (2018) The relationship between nomophobia and loneliness among Turkish adolescents. Int J Res Education Sci 4(2):358–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kayis AR, Satici B, Deniz ME, Satici SA, Griffiths MD (2021) Fear of COVID-19, loneliness, smartphone addiction, and mental wellbeing among the Turkish general population: a serial mediation model. Behav Information Technol 1-13.

  54. Rachubińska K, Cybulska AM, Grochans E (2021) The relationship between loneliness, depression, internet and social media addiction among young Polish women. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 25(4):1982–1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The participants in this study are all gratefully acknowledged by the authors.


There was no explicit finance for this study from public, corporate, or nonprofit organizations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



HR designed the study, gathered and analyzed the data, and authored and updated the report. The author also read and agreed on the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rasha Mohammed Hussien.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The researchers submitted an official letter issued from the scientific Research Ethics Committee to Qassim University, to conduct the study. All subjects electronically provided their informed consent prior to registration. On the screen requesting informed consent, there were only two options: yes or no. Only those who clicked “yes” were taken to the survey page, where they were informed that they could leave the study whenever they wanted without providing a reason.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hussien, R.M. The association between nomophobia and loneliness among the general population in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Middle East Curr Psychiatry 29, 68 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: