Skip to main content

The effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with the obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial

Abstract

Background

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a complicated neuropsychiatric disorder, which its prevalence ranges from 2 to 4%. In 30–60% of patients due to intolerance of side effects or partial response to treat symptoms of the disease remain or relapse. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive therapeutic option to treat this condition. Transcranial magnetic stimulation can be applied for treating with no anesthesia. The current study intended to evaluate the effectiveness of low-frequency rTMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as an adjunct treatment in combination with standard medication in patients with OCD.

Results

In both groups of intervention and sham, the Y-BOCS scale was decreased. There was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.82). Also after 15 sessions, the symptoms of OCD patients were improved. Although the treatment process was the same in the control group, none of the patients showed any serious complications, such as seizures, severe headache, neurological complication, or cognitive impairment during treatment.

Conclusions

It seems that treatment with 1 Hz rTMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex does not play an effective role in the recovery of OCD patients.

Trial registration

Name of the registry: Therapeutic effect comparison of the Repetitive Transcranial MagneticMagnetic Stimulation (RTMS) combination therapy with drug versus medication monotherapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Trial registration number: IRCT ID: IRCT20200728048240N1. Date of registration: 2020/8/8.

Background

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic psychiatric problem with varying degrees, ranging from very severe and debilitating to mild symptoms [1]. The prevalence of this disease has been reported at 1–3% in the general population [2]. In Iran, the prevalence of OCD is reported as 5.1, based on a recent national survey [3]. The distribution of the disease is almost the same between both genders, although it affects most men during childhood and early adolescence [4]. The exact etiology of OCD is not known, but there is ample evidence of an Orbitofrontal striatalpalidothalamic neurological disorder. Similar neural flow disorders have been reported in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), medial prefrontal (MPF), anterior cingulate (ACC), supplementary motor area (SMA), and basal ganglia (BG) [5,6,7]. Different research on brain-imaging functions, for instance, positron emission tomography (PET), is associated with an enhanced function of the frontal lobes, the basal ganglia (particularly the caudate), and the cingulum of those who suffer from OCD. Studies on pathological aspects of OCD have shown that affecting these areas is more due to corticostriatal pathways than amygdale mechanisms [8, 9].

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) are the first-line treatment for OCD. SSRI often declines the intensity of OCD presentations by 20–30%, which is low [10]. These patients benefit from cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) [11, 12]. In refractory cases, selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) is the next therapeutic option [13, 14]. Unfortunately, many patients (40–60%) do not respond satisfactorily to pharmacotherapy, and even after switching to other treatments, the final goal is still not obtained [15], which has been seen in severe cases resistant to OCD treatment.

Brain stimulation (BS) methods have been proposed as adjuvant therapy in OCD. BS is based on applying electrical flows or magnetic fields to change neuronal firing. Currently, several tools can be used to elicit such as neuromodulation. Each tool contains a various range of actions. Such tools are based on using an electrical or magnetic field or embedding the electrodes within the body to create electrical flows to a cranial electrical stimulation (CES), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and magnetic seizure therapy (MST). The surgical methods contain cortical brain stimulation (CBT), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) [16, 17]. TMS and other types of magnetic stimulation may have a promising effect on the symptoms of OCD because of its focality and non-invasiveness. TMS contains using quickly altering magnetic field to the upper layer of the cerebral cortex, which causes regional stimulation of electric flows. Also referred to as eddy TMS is an example of a noninvasive induction method of focal areas of the brain and it can also be applied for studying or treating with no anesthesia.

DLPFC is one of the most effective rTMS regions for the treatment of OCD patients. Research on the pathophysiological aspect of OCD has shown that this area is associated with cortical and subcortical lobe hyperactivity [18]. This area plays an important role in executive processes and cognitive control. This includes the ability to focus thoughts and change flexibility [19]. Research suggests that stimulation of rTMS in the DLPFC region may be effective in orbitofrontal cortex hyperactivity. This effect may be achieved by activating the indirect inhibitory pathway or by direct connection between the DLPFC and the orbitofrontal cortex [20]. In healthy individuals, high-frequency (HF) rTMS may modulate dopamine release in the orbitofrontal cortex and caudate nucleus by inducing a stimulatory effect of rTMS on DLPFC [21, 22]. Whereas low-frequency (LF) rTMS with inhibitory effect leads to reduction of regional blood in the orbitofrontal cortex [23]. Studies in this field have heterogeneous designs in terms of excitation location (right vs. left), parameters and excitation frequency (LF vs. HF), session duration, sham conditions, and coil shape, this has led to conflicting results in this area [15, 24], so there is a need for further studies with different strategies in this field. The current study intended to evaluate the effectiveness of low-frequency rTMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex as an adjunct treatment in combination with standard medication in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Methods

Based on the effect size (f = 0.9) obtained from previous studies, for a critical P value of 0.05 and a critical power level of 0.80, a sample size of 30 was calculated. At first, 47 patients were studied to comply with the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients with a history of OCD referred to one of the university psychiatric clinics who, based on an interview with a psychiatrist, met the DSM5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder 5th Edition) criteria for obsessive-compulsive disorder and had no other psychiatric disorders, were studied. According to the Beck Depression questionnaire, participants should not have a history of depression. In this study, we used the Persian version of Y-BOCS because the participants were Iranian. It is a clinical standard for assessing the severity of OCD and has good reliability and validity for this purpose (test-retest reliability (0.99)). At the beginning of the study, the Y-BOCS questionnaire was completed for all patients, and patients with a score equal to or greater than 16 entered the research project [25].

Inclusion criteria included being aged 18 to 60 years old, histories of moderate to severe OCD (score greater than or equal to 16 of the Y-BOCS questionnaire), and a score less than 17 according to the Beck Depression questionnaire and receiving standard OCD drug treatment for the last 4 weeks.

Exclusion criteria included association with other psychiatric illnesses, having an intellectual disability, history of epilepsy or seizures, documented substance use disorder, documented severe head trauma, severe neurosurgical procedure, having any type of metal implant, having a pacemaker in situ, and receiving any type of electroconvulsive therapy in the previous month.

The final sample included in the analyses consisted of 30 patients: 15 in the active group and 15 in the sham group. A personal checklist was used to collect patients’ characteristics. Before obtaining written informed consent, the objectives of the study were explained to the potential patients. Besides, they were ensured that the treatment would not harm them and their information would be kept confidential. Also, they were informed that they can withdraw at any time.

The recruited subjects (n=30) were divided into two groups of A or B using a randomized block table. Group A was treated with magnetic rapid stimulator (Magstim Rapid Stimulator; Magstim Company, Ltd., Whitland, UK), 20 min per day and 5 days per week (a total of 1200 pulses/day) with an intensity of 110% of the motor threshold and with standard medications for OCD. Those in group B were only treated with standard medications for OCD and a sham device for the same number of times and duration as group A.

The target area of ​rTMS in all patients was the Left DLPFC, which is an extensive region. Hence, a 70-mm circular coil was applied. The coil was kept in a manner to be superior to the inferior frontal sulcus. Also, it was anterior to the precentral sulcus.

Patients were blinded to the applied intervention. At the end of each week, an examiner was obliged to reexamine the patients’ clinical symptoms as well as to fill the Y-BOCS questionnaire. The questionnaire was filled in blindly. The mean scores of the questionnaire as well as the observations and clinical evaluations of both groups were compared before and after providing the intervention. Besides, intra-group comparisons were also performed. These comparisons intended to evaluate the effectiveness of each treatment regimen independently and in comparison with the other group were addressed.

All subjects signed the informed consent form. Also, all data were kept confidential and analyzed anonymously. The participants were allowed to leave the trial at any step. All interventions and assessments were free for the subjects. Additionally, the current study has been designed and performed in agreement with the Helsinki declaration with no patient being deprived of essential treatment. This study is confirmed by the Ethical Committee of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (IR.QUMS.REC.1396.63). Moreover, the current study is documented at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT ID: IRCT20200728048240N1).

Results

Of the 30 patients initially recruited for the present study, 8 (26/7%) were male and 22 (54/3%) were female. Twenty-five participants (83/3%) were married. The mean age of patients was 39.3 years. The youngest and oldest participants were 20 and 59 years old, respectively. Most patients were married and had severe diseases. The active and sham groups did not significantly differ in terms of any clinical or demographic characteristics (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic information in both groups

Comparison of the mean score of the Y-BOCS questionnaire before treatment in the two groups showed no significant difference between the scores (p value= 0.27). Considering all patients, the mean score of the questionnaire before treatment was 22.7 ± 5.6. In group A, that received rTMS, the mean score of the questionnaire after 5 sessions was 16.53 ± 5.3. The mean score of the questionnaire after 10 sessions was 14.97 ± 5.3. The mean score of the questionnaire after 15 sessions was 13 ± 6.35 (Table 2).

Table 2 Comparison Y-BOCS scores in the beginning of the study and 5th, 10th, and 15th sessions in both groups

The ANOVA analysis, which was performed after the last session between each group, showed no statistically significant difference (p value = 0.82). It is worth noting that none of the patients showed any serious complications, such as seizures, severe headache, neurological complications, or cognitive impairment during treatment.

Discussion

This study demonstrated that low-frequency rTMS on the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, compared to the sham, could not improve the severity of OCD. As a result, one of the effective factors is the time spent on treatment. We performed the first evaluation after five sessions, while some studies in the early hours reported the effectiveness of this treatment in improving OCD symptoms [26]. Although this suggests that rTMS may speed up patients’ recovery, it does not appear to have a significant effect on the final result.

Other factors influencing the outcome of the treatment include the area being treated and the intensity and frequency of rTMS. In this study, we investigated all OCD types; hence, separating different types of OCD may have affected the results.

Most previous studies have focused on patients with a history of drug resistance, but in the present study, rTMS was used to treat the patients responding to medication.

Numerous studies have used rTMS in refractory OCD. Meanwhile, research on the lateral posterior prefrontal cortex reported conflicting findings. So that six research on cranial electrical stimulation (CES), electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), and magnetic seizure therapy (MST). The surgical methods contain cortical brain stimulation (CBS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), which applied low-frequency stimulation, achieved similar findings indicating that treatment was effective on OCD symptoms [24, 27,28,29,30,31,32]. However, in this study, which was performed on OCD responders, treatment with rTMS was not different from Sham, but the disease process improved.

Hence, it can be argued that 1 Hz rTMS may be an adjunct therapy for refractory OCD patients but may not be effective in treating OCD. According to the evidence, rTMS aimed at targeting SMA (supplementary motor area) may be positively associated with better health status in OCD patients, although the association between SMA neuromodulation and the OCD as well as the effect of rTMS on it has not yet been elucidated [30, 31]. To clarify this issue, it is important to understand the concept of obsession as a form of thinking disorder and compulsion as a behavior. In studies that reported positive effects of rTMS on OCD, the advancement in Y-BOCS score can be attributed to the enhanced compulsion, in the meantime, no decline was observed in obsession. Greenberg and colleagues reported that a high-frequency rTMS session on the Left lateral peripheral cortex greatly reduced the urge to compulsion but did not affect obsession [33].

Neuroimaging studies have reported a probable association between hyperactive SMA in OCD individuals and impaired inhibitory management of behavior. Thus, SMA is an interesting goal for manipulating subcortical areas, which can affect OCD presentations, particularly in compelling behaviors [34].

We did not find any adverse effects (e.g., seizure, intense headache, and delirium). The findings of the present study are in line with most research approving that rTMS is safe and tolerable. Small sample size, short-term follow-up, lack of cognitive structural assessment, and lack of total blindness are the main limitations of the trial.

Because rTMS is not approved by the FDA for the treatment of anxiety, this led us to consider anxiety as an exclusion criterion. The severity of anxiety may have differing effects on the efficacy of the standard drug treatment for OCD in each group. Furthermore, different levels of anxiety can cause various degrees of neurotransmitters, like dopamine and norepinephrine, as well as a variety of hormones like cortisol. These, in turn, may have different effects on the neuro-excitability and neuro-biochemistry of the neural tissues targeted by rTMS producing differing responses. Similar to previous studies, in the present study, the Y-BOCS questionnaire was used to measure the severity of OCD, Therefore, the symptoms of obsession and compulsion were not evaluated separately [35]. In future studies, it is suggested that the sample size be larger so that the exact effects of rTMS can be determined through such research.

Conclusions

In this study, after 15 sessions of 1 Hz rTMS with no cognitive side-effect or intense adverse consequences, the symptoms of OCD patients were markedly reduced, although the treatment process was the same in the control group. Despite these limitations, the results of this study are still valuable, as we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of the aforementioned technique in patients with OCD, albeit some differences were observed compared to previous studies.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

OCD:

Obsessive-compulsive disorder

rTMS:

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

SSRI:

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors

CBT:

Cognitive-behavioral therapy

SNRI:

Selective serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor

DLPFC:

Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

Y-BOCS:

Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale

OFC:

Orbitofrontal cortex

MPF:

Medial prefrontal

ACC:

Anterior cingulate cortex

SMA:

Supplementary motor area

BG:

Basal ganglia

PET:

Positron emission tomography

BS:

Brain stimulation

CES:

Cranial electrical stimulation

ECT:

Electroconvulsive therapy

tDCS:

Transcranial direct current stimulation

TMS:

Transcranial magnetic stimulation

MST:

Magnetic seizure therapy

CBS:

Cortical brain stimulation

DBS:

Deep brain stimulation

VNS:

Vagus nerve stimulation

CES:

Cranial electrical stimulation

ECT:

Electroconvulsive therapy

tDCS:

Transcranial direct current stimulation

IRCT:

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

DSM5:

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder 5th Edition

References

  1. Ruscio AM, Stein DJ, Chiu WT, Kessler RC (2010) The epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Mol Psychiatry 15(1):53–63

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Heidari M, Zarei M, Hosseini SM, Taghvaei R, Maleki H, Tabrizi M et al (2014) Ondansetron or placebo in the augmentation of fluvoxamine response over 8 weeks in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 29(6):344–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharifi V, Amin-Esmaeili M, Hajebi A, Motevalian A, Radgoodarzi R, Hefazi M et al (2015) Twelve-month prevalence and correlates of psychiatric disorders in Iran: the Iranian Mental Health Survey, 2011. Arch Iran Med 18(2):76–84

  4. Castle DJ, Deale A, Marks IM (1995) Gender differences in obsessive compulsive disorder. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 29(1):114–117

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Del Casale A, Kotzalidis G, Rapinesi C, Serata D, Ambrosi E, Simonetti A et al (2011) Functional neuroimaging in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuropsychobiology 64(2):61–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fineberg N, Chamberlain S, Hollander E, Boulougouris V, Robbins T (2011) Translational approaches to obsessive-compulsive disorder: from animal models to clinical treatment. Br J Pharmacol 164(4):1044–1061

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Milad MR, Rauch SL (2012) Obsessive-compulsive disorder: beyond segregated cortico-striatal pathways. Trends Cogn Sci 16(1):43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shalbafan M, Malekpour F, Tadayon Najafabadi B, Ghamari K, Dastgheib S-A, Mowla A et al (2019) Fluvoxamine combination therapy with tropisetron for obsessive-compulsive disorder patients: A placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. J Psychopharmacol 33(11):1407–1414

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Arabzadeh S, Shahhossenie M, Mesgarpour B, Rezaei F, Shalbafan MR, Ghiasi Z et al (2017) L-carnosine as an adjuvant to fluvoxamine in treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder: A randomized double-blind study. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp 32(4):e2584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pigott TA, Seay SM (1999) A review of the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in obsessive-compulsive disorder. J Clin Psychiatry 60(2):101–106

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Association AP, Koran LM, Hanna GL, Hollander E, Nestadt G, Simpson HB (2007) Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry 164(7 Suppl):5–53

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stein DJ, Koen N, Fineberg N, Fontenelle LF, Matsunaga H, Osser D et al (2012) A 2012 evidence-based algorithm for the pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Curr Psychiatry Rep 14(3):211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bandelow B, Zohar J, Hollander E, Kasper S, Möller H-J (2008) WFSBP Task Force on Treatment Guidelines for Anxiety, Obsessive-Compulsive and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders. World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of anxiety, obsessive-compulsive and post-traumatic stress disorders—first revision. World J Biol Psychiatry 9(4):248–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Abudy A, Juven-Wetzler A, Zohar J (2011) Pharmacological management of treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. CNS drugs 25(7):585–596

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pallanti S, Hollander E, Bienstock C, Koran L, Leckman J, Marazziti D et al (2002) Treatment non-response in OCD: methodological issues and operational definitions. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 5(2):181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Trevizol AP, Shiozawa P, Cook IA, Sato IA, Kaku CB, Guimarães FB et al (2016) Transcranial magnetic stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J ECT 32(4):262–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rapinesi C, Kotzalidis GD, Ferracuti S, Sani G, Girardi P, Del Casale A (2019) Brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): a systematic review. Curr Neuropharmacol 17(8):787–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aouizerate B, Guehl D, Cuny E, Rougier A, Bioulac B, Tignol J et al (2004) Pathophysiology of obsessive–compulsive disorder: a necessary link between phenomenology, neuropsychology, imagery and physiology. Prog Neurobiol 72(3):195–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kunde W, Reuss H, Kiesel A (2012) Consciousness and cognitive control. Adv Cogn Psychol 8(1):9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bais M, Figee M, Denys D (2014) Neuromodulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatr Clin 37(3):393–413

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cho SS, Strafella AP (2009) rTMS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates dopamine release in the ipsilateral anterior cingulate cortex and orbitofrontal cortex. PLoS One 4(8):e6725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Strafella AP, Paus T, Barrett J, Dagher A (2001) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human prefrontal cortex induces dopamine release in the caudate nucleus. J Neurosci 21(15):RC157–RC1RC

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Knoch D, Treyer V, Regard M, Müri RM, Buck A, Weber B (2006) Lateralized and frequency-dependent effects of prefrontal rTMS on regional cerebral blood flow. Neuroimage 31(2):641–648

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mantovani A, Rossi S, Bassi BD, Simpson HB, Fallon BA, Lisanby SH (2013) Modulation of motor cortex excitability in obsessive-compulsive disorder: an exploratory study on the relations of neurophysiology measures with clinical outcome. Psychiatry Res 210(3):1026–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rajezi Esfahani S, Motaghipour Y, Kamkari K, Zahiredin A, Janbozorgi M (2012) Reliability and Validity of the Persian Version of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS). Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci 17(4):297–303

    Google Scholar 

  26. Greenberg BD, George MS, Martin JD, Benjamin J, Schlaepfer TE, Altemus M et al (1997) Effect of prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a preliminary study. Am J Psychiatry 154(6):867–869

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shayganfard M, Jahangard L, Nazaribadie M, Haghighi M, Ahmadpanah M, Bahmani DS et al (2016) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improved symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorders but not executive functions: Results from a randomized clinical trial with crossover design and sham condition. Neuropsychobiology 74(2):115–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pallanti S, Marras A, Salerno L, Makris N, Hollander E (2016) Better than treated as usual: Transcranial magnetic stimulation augmentation in selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor-refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder, mini-review and pilot open-label trial. J Psychopharmacol 30(6):568–578

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar N, Chadda R (2011) Augmentation effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the supplementary motor cortex in treatment refractory patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. Indian J Psychiatry 53(4):340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Gomes PVO, Brasil-Neto JP, Allam N, Rodrigues de Souza E (2012) A randomized, double-blind trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder with three-month follow-up. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 24(4):437–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mantovani A, Simpson HB, Fallon BA, Rossi S, Lisanby SH (2010) Randomized sham-controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treatment-resistant obsessive–compulsive disorder. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 13(2):217–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mantovani A, Lisanby SH, Pieraccini F, Ulivelli M, Castrogiovanni P, Rossi S (2006) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette's syndrome (TS). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 9(1):95–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Greenberg BD, Ziemann U, Cora-Locatelli G, Harmon A, Murphy D, Keel J et al (2000) Altered cortical excitability in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Neurology 54(1):142

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mantovani A, Leckman JF, Grantz H, King RA, Sporn AL, Lisanby SH (2007) Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the supplementary motor area in the treatment of Tourette syndrome: report of two cases. Clin Neurophysiol 10(118):2314–2315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Seo HJ, Jung YE, Lim HK, Um YH, Lee CU, Chae JH (2016) Adjunctive Low-frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Patients with Treatment-resistant Obsessive-compulsive Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 14(2):153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Qazvin University of Medical Sciences for providing the context and facilities for this research, and thanks to all the colleagues who assisted in the implementation of this project. In addition, the authors would like to appreciate very much for the kind collaboration of Dr. Saeideh Gholamzadeh Khoei.

Funding

No source of funding is reported.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

We have the pleasure of sending you the manuscript entitled “The effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with the obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial” authored by AAD and SAH to be considered for publication as a research article in your prestigious journal. All authors have seen and approved the manuscript and have contributed significantly to the paper. AAD: Conceptualization, visualization, investigation, supervision, and writing of the original draft. SAH: visualization, conceptualization, investigation, data curation, and writing reviewing, and editing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seyed Alireza Haji Seyed Javadi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qazvin University of Medical Sciences (Ethics Code: IR.QUMS. REC.1396.63); also, the current study is documented at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT ID: IRCT20200728048240N1). A written consent form was also obtained from the patients for this study.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this information and accompanying images.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diarjani, A.A., Javadi, S.A.H.S. The effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in patients with the obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial. Middle East Curr Psychiatry 29, 15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-022-00172-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-022-00172-6

Keywords

  • Obsessive-compulsive disorder
  • Therapy
  • Neuropsychiatry
  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation