Skip to main content

Table 3 Mediation analysis

From: The mediating effect of social support and body appreciation between child abuse and disordered eating symptoms among Lebanese adolescents

 

Direct effect

Indirect effect

 

Beta

SE (B)

p

Beta

SE (B)

BCa CI

Model 1: Social support as the mediator

 Psychological abuse

.45

.12

 < .001

.36

.08

.22; .52a

 Neglect

.04

.09

.610

.21

.05

.12; .32a

 Physical abuse

.53

.12

 < .001

.32

.07

.20; .47a

 Sexual abuse

.39

.12

.001

.34

.07

.22; .48a

Model 2: Body appreciation as the mediator

 Psychological abuse

.49

.12

 < .001

.32

.07

.19; .46a

 Neglect

.10

.09

.246

.16

.05

.07; .25a

 Physical abuse

.55

.12

 < .001

.30

.07

.17; .45a

 Sexual abuse

.41

.12

 < .001

.32

.07

.19; .46a

  1. aindicates significant mediation. Direct effect refers to the direct association from the independent variable (child abuse) to the dependent variable (disordered eating symptoms) without the effect of the mediator (social support/ body appreciation). Indirect effect refers to the same association through the effect of the mediator (social support/ body appreciation)